Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume I
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Sider: 448
UDK: 600 Eng -gl.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
116
ENGINEERING WONDERS OF THE WORLD.
construction. The doors in the cross wall,
instead of being simple shutters, as in the other
tunnels, were cylindrical cut-off
Thp
gates, which could be opened
Shields. ,
or shut even while mud was
flowing in, without having to displace or
crowd back this material. At the front of
the shield the horizontal working platforms
were provided with extensible slides, pressed
forward when desired by hydraulic jacks.
These could be pushed out against the “ sheet-
ing ” or timbering of the earth face, and
would hold it in place even while the shield
itself was being “ shoved ” forward. Such
platforms were also used on the shields of
the lower Hudson tunnels and on the Bel-
mont shields,
Under the main part of the river the two
tubes encountered river silt only. But at
and near the shores they had to pass through
sand and gravel, which required the employ-
ment of methods very different from those
suitable for penetrating mud.
In the mud it was found that, as in the
case of the Hudson tunnels, the shield could
push its way through the materials. But a
Fig. 17.—A STEEL-PLATE CAISSON TO BE SUNK AS A
SHAFT FROM WHICH TWO TUNNEL SHIELDS ARE TO
BE STARTED. (LONG ISLAND END OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAILROAD EAST RIVER TUNNELS.)
The shields of the two tubes were started from this caisson,
through the removable circular panels of wall seen in the
picture.
curious action developed. If the shield doors
were all shut and no mud taken in, the act
of shoving the shield would
also make it rise, owing to the 5Ur*°us
fact that the displaced mud
necessarily had to flow upward, lifting the
river bottom, which flow would carry the
shield with it. Experience showed that, if
the lowest door of th© shield was kept open
during the “ shove,” allowing part of the
mud to be squeezed inward into the tunnel,
the rising tendency of the shield was neutral-
ized. By due observance of this condition
the progress through the silt was expeditious
and satisfactory, the shield being kept very
close to a mathematically correct alignment.
The accuracy of junction of the shields,
shown strikingly by the view (Fig. 15), de-
monstrates the excellence of guidance attained.
In the sand and gravel, however, the shield
could not do its own excavating in this way,
so the workmen had to go out in front of the
shield and dig away the soil, keeping it tim-
bered very carefully.
The exceedingly treacherous nature of work
in wet sand is well illustrated by an incident
that occurred on the New Jersey shore—
landward of the shield work, ~ .
_ 4 . Quicksand.
it is true, but under tint ber-
ing methods like those used in front of a
shield. Here one day the quicksand face
broke through the timbering, and the run-
ning, water-charged material poured in in
such volume, that several hundred feet of
the tunnel were filled up. What happened
on the ground surface overhead during this
break-in is demonstrated by the photograph
(Fig. 11). There was a railway freight yard
above, and when the ground sank down
into the tunnel a great hole was formed,
which, as the view shows, swallowed up
several freight cars.
The worst part of the shield work occurred
at the New York shore, where the tunnel
passed through the piling and stone filling