Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume I
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Sider: 448
UDK: 600 Eng -gl.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
THE BRIDGES OF NEW YORK CITY.
261
described farther on in this chapter, we need
not stop to recount the work of the Brooklyn
Bridge builders. Some points in its later his-
tory, however, merit our attention.
Fig. 4.—TOP OF ONE OF THE BROOKLYN BRIDGE
TOWERS, SHOWING THE LARGE SADDLE OVER
WHICH A MAIN CABLE PASSES.
The saddle rests on rollers which permit easy movement
to accommodate expansion and contraction of the cable, or
changes of load. From near the saddle radiate diagonal
stays to the stiffening girder.
It is a very interesting fact that the heavy
traffic across the bridge has gradually become
too great, chiefly because the ponderous rail-
way and trolley cars of to-day
Strengthening- were no^. anficipated forty years
the Bridge. . *
ago. Therefore the authorities
of New York city have for some time been
planning to strengthen the bridge. Highly
ingenious schemes for doing this have been
devised. Unfortunately, they are too intricate
to be described here. Suffice it to say that
the main parts of the bridge—the cables and
the great stone towers—are amply strong ;
the weakness is in the smaller pieces, detail
parts, and connections. This is not surprising,
for, as engineers well know, many structures
are weakest in details, just as a garment is
apt to show its first troubles at the buttons
or in the seams.
Fig. 5.
A sensational illustration of this fact de-
veloped in the Brooklyn Bridge a few years
ago. On a hot summer day in 1901 several
of the short suspender rods near the middle
of the bridge (Fig. 5 shows tlieir position)
were found to be broken through. These rods
are capable of holding up some 60 to 80 tons
each, but evidently they had been overworked
by the to-and-fro movement of the bridge as
its metal-work contracted or expanded with
the temperature changes. Clearly the adja-
cent rods now had to do extra duty, and there
was danger that they might all tear in succes-
sion, like the easy ripping of a seam after the
first thread is started—a very grave danger,
since the whole roadway would drop into the
river. Needless to say, prompt and energetic
action was taken. The roadway was fenced
off on the side of the broken rods, and new
rods were made and inserted. A thorough
investigation subsequently showed that the
bridge, sooner or later, must have a general
strengthening of its small parts.
Incidentally, let it be remarked that this
bridge costs the city nearly half a million
dollars each year merely for inspection, paint-
ing, cleaning, and small repairs—a good-sized
fortune. The income from the rental pay-
ments of the cars which cross the bridge just
about balances this annual expense.
THE WILLIAMSBURGH BRIDGE.
Thirteen years elapsed between the open-
ing of the Brooklyn Bridge and the commence-
ment of the work on the second bridge across
the East River, in 1897. During this period
bridge-building science had advanced so much
that, whereas fourteen years were needed to
construct the first bridge, the Williamsburgh
Bridge took less than half that time—that is,
a few months over six years. Yet it is both
longer and much stronger than its older brother,
being able to carry about twice as great a
load per running foot of bridge (see its cross-
section, Fig. 7). The two more recent bridges,
it is true, have been made still stronger, but
the Williamsburgh Bridge retains the honour