Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume I
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Sider: 448
UDK: 600 Eng -gl.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
425
Fig.' 17.—DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATING THE ADHESION
BETWEEN CONCRETE AND STEEL.
If a bar 1 inch square in section be embedded 10 inches in
concrete, a pull of 16,000 lbs. will be required to withdraw
it. The resistance varies proportionately with the area of
steel in contact with the concrete. A 1-inch bar of average
mild steel could not be withdrawn if embedded 40 inches, as
the adhesion would be greater than thø tensile strength of
the metal.
will develop cracks long before there is any
danger of rupture in the beam as a whole.
Nevertheless, the cracks are so numerous
and so exceedingly small that the concrete
in tension does not fail as a whole, its useful-
ness is not impaired, and the concrete in com-
pression (see Fig. 19) does not suffer in any
way.
The general result is that, while a plain con-
crete beam would suddenly break under loads
causing the tensile stress of, say, 200 lbs. per
square inch, a reinforced concrete beam would
not begin to show any signs of impending
failure until stretched to an extent equivalent
to that produced by a 2,000 lbs. per square
inch ; and even then the indications of threat-
ened failure would simply be due to the fact
that the steel had been stressed up to or
beyond the limit of the concrete’s elasticity.
Finally, it should be noted that, whereas
plain concrete gives no warning of failure,
reinforced concrete always does so by gradual
widening of the hair cracks, and that in cases
where ordinary loads are adopted the cracks
are quite invisible, and close up again on
removal of the load, and the beam resumes
its original form. The result is that reinforced
concrete beams behave exactly as if they were
constructed of a perfectly elastic material.
In fact, we are justified in considering rein-
forced concrete to be a species of elastic stone,
combining the compressive strength, solidity,
and durability of rock with the tenacity and
elasticity of steel. By its aid light and elegant
structures can be designed which compare in
these respects with the best examples of steel-
work ; but, unlike the latter, they are immune
from injury by the atmosphere, and, unlike
structures built of any other material, they
continue to increase in strength year by year.
In one form or another beams enter into
almost every type of construction, as the
girders and platforms of bridges, the decking
of wharves and piers, the
floors and roofs of buildings,
and the bottom of docks,
reservoirs, and aqueducts.
Beams are applied vertically
of walls for buildings, docks, reservoirs, of
retaining walls, and of various other struc-
tures too numerous for individual mention.
However, if reinforced concrete could be
employed with advantage in the form of beams
and kindred members only, the
the new material would be
seriously limited. The fact is
that in constructive work beams
have generally to be used in
conjunction with members designed to with-
stand forces applied parallel to their length,
or in conjunction with members designed to
withstand forces applied parallel to their length
and other forces acting transversely.
These two kinds of members are illustrated
in Figs. 20 and 21. In th© former diagram
we have a thick column loaded at the top in
such manner that the lines of pressure due to
the collective load P are parallel to the sides
of the member. It will be seen from Fig. 20
Many Uses
of Ferro-
Concrete.
in the design
usefulness of
Reinforced
Concrete
Columns.