Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume III
Forfatter: Archibald Williams
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Forlag: Thomas Nelson and Sons
Sted: London, Edinburgh, Dublin and New York
Sider: 407
UDK: 600 eng- gl
With 424 Illustrations, Maps, and Diagrams
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
6 ENGINEERING WONDERS OF THE WORLD.
and more air until a state of equilibrium is
again attained. We must observe, however,
that this increase of angle means also a great
increase in drift proportionately to lift. If
the descent of the kite had been caused, not
by decrease in wind velocity, but by the addi-
tion of weight to the kite, the increase in the
pull on the string would have been very
noticeable.
Fig. 1.—DIAGRAM TO SHOW THE FORCES ACTING
ON A KITE.
It is the aim of the kite-maker as well as
of the aeroplane builder to design surfaces
which shall use the wind pressure most effi-
ciently—that is, extract a maximum of lifting
force, and be subject to a minimum of drift.
If the string of a kite breaks, the equilibrium
of forces is destroyed ; drift and gravity take
command, and the kite either tumbles or glides
to earth backwards. If it were possible to
attach to the kite at the moment of rupture
a weightless engine and propeller, exerting a
horizontal windward push equal to the drift,
the kite would remain stationary.
Again, were the wind to drop suddenly, and
the engine to give the kite a forward velocity
equal to that of the wind, the kite would move
forward—assuming that it were able to main-
tain its stability—and be a true aeroplane or
self - supporting heavier - than - air apparatus.
Under usual conditions a kite is not strictly
self-supporting, in that it depends on the resist-
ance of a string anchored to a fixed point.
Lilienthal, the great German experimenter,
Octave Chanute, the brothers Wright, and
other seekers after aerostatical knowledge,
made use of man - bearing
« T-I „ ... r “ Gliders.
gliders, either free or an-
chored, of large area, as well as of laboratory
tests on surfaces of various forms, from which
was derived the preliminary knowledge neces-
sary to the construction of mechanical self-
propelled and self-sustaining machines. With-
out going into wearisome details, it may be
stated that the shape and the arrangement of
surfaces to give the greatest lifting power and
stability were the chief objects of their search.
It. was proved conclusively that (a) a true
plane had not, area for area, so great a sustain-
ing power as a slightly curved surface, convex
on the upper side. Horatio
Phillips, and subsequently Shape of
Maxim, demonstrated by elabo- s“PPortin£
rate tests that (6) an aeroplane
(we here apply the term to a sustaining sur-
face, not to a machine) with the upper surface
more curved than the lower, and inclining
downwards in front so as to give a “ negative
entering angle ” (see Fig. 2), was most efficient.
Fig. 2.—SECTION OF A DECK WHICH GIVES GOOD
LIFTING POWER.
Tho arrows indicate the direction of the wind.
Tests showed that (c) depth fore and aft was
not so important as length of transverse enter-
ing edge ; that, in fact, a number of narrow
aeroplanes, arranged one over the other, Vene-
tian blind fashion, were much more effective
than a single aeroplane of equal length and of
a breadth totalling that of the narrow aero-
planes. It has been established that (d) in
the case of well-made aeroplanes the lift in-
creases, within certain limits, in direct propor-
tion to the angle of inclination or incidence :
thus, a plane making an angle of 10° with the
horizontal has twice the lift of one inclined
at 5° to the horizontal. Also that (e) the drift