Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume I
Forfatter: Archibald Williams
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Forlag: Thomas Nelson and Sons
Sted: London, Edinburgh, Dublin and New York
Sider: 456
UDK: 600 eng - gl.
Volume I with 520 Illustrations, Maps and Diagrams
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
212
ENGINEERING WONDERS OF THE WORLD.
A Descrip-
tion of
Working
Operations.
central span would have found a resting-place
in the bed of the river. Thus ended a very
exciting episode in the history of engineering.
Another cause of apprehension presently ap-
peared in the form of huge rafts sweeping
down-stream at such a pace as to be prac-
tically unsteerable. Large numbers of them,
massed together, struck the dam surrounding
the site of pier No. 11. Several men were
upset into the seething waters among the logs
and swept away ; but, in spite of their ap-
parently hopeless position, all the victims of
this accident escaped with a good ducking.
The crib, however, somewhat shaken by the
collision, had to be repaired. Then things
went ahead rapidly. To use the words of
the engineer-in-charge : “ The works pre-
sented a small island of crib-
work surrounded by barges
laden with stone, timber, steam
engines, puddle clay, traveller
stagings, and pumping ma-
chinery, in the midst of which were crowds
of men apparently in the greatest confusion.
This, added to the shoutings of the workmen,
the noise of the pile engines, the ‘ yeo-heave-
yeo ’ of the British boatmen unloading ma-
terials on one side, enlivened by a chorus
of French Canadians chanting their boat-
songs to the time of their work on the other,
amidst a torrent of waters rushing past, with
the surging and creaking of the barges as they
tugged and tried to break adrift, formed, at
first sight, such a bewildering scene of ap-
parent disorder and confusion as can scarcely
be described.
“ A careful survey, however, must have
satisfied the observer that, instead of con-
fusion, everything was order. Observing the
gang of men driving piles with a steam engine
at one place, he would not fail to notice that
they were as indifferent to what was going
on around them as if not a soul was there but
themselves. So with a body of mechanics
putting up pumping apparatus ; or with the
divers, the men working the air-pumps as
unconcernedly and with as much confidence
as a philosopher would prosecute experiments
in a closet. At another place the dredging
machine, worked by a steam engine, would
be seen scooping every bit of loose material
from the puddle chamber ; while in the rear
were men wheeling puddle into the cleared
space, each, side of which was lined with men
armed with rammers, puddling and working
the clay into every hole and corner so that
there might be no leakage.”
On August 2 the river-bed at the site of
this, the last, pier was pumped dry, while out-
side the dam the river ran past at the rate
of eight or nine miles an hour. The masonry
was laid at such a pace that by September 26,
1859, the masonry of the bridge was com-
pleted. Before the end of the year the first
train passed through the bridge. This event
occurred simultaneously with a powerful ice-
shove, which loosened the temporary staging
that had carried the span and swept it bodily
down-stream.
The chief operations remaining to be done
were to roof over the tubes with wood and
sheet iron, and to provide rails on which
should run the travellers used
in the painting of the tubes.
From each end of the trav-
eller hung platforms which
could be swung outwards for the passage of
a pier. The need for a proper provision of
this kind will be understood when it is stated
that the surface to be covered by each coating
was no less than 32 acres—that is, the painters
had to cover 128 acres, the area of a fair-sized
farm, before the four coatings were on.
The stiffness of the bridge was tested by
running over it trains averaging one ton per
foot in weight. Under full load the deflection
of the central span was found to be little
more than one inch, and, in the case of the
shorter tubes, only about three-quarters of an
inch. In all cases the tubes returned to their
Painting
the
Tubes.