The Romance of Modern Chemistry
Forfatter: James C. Phillip
År: 1912
Forlag: Seeley, Service & Co. Limited
Sted: London
Sider: 347
UDK: 540 Phi
A Description in non-technical Language of the diverse and wonderful ways in which chemical forces are at work and of their manifold application in modern life.
With 29 illustrations & 15 diagrams.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
THE DAWN OF CHEMISTRY
endeavouring to predict what should be found within, but
never making any attempt to effect an entrance, and see
how the facts squared with their predictions.
In one respect, however, the chemical speculations of
the ancient philosophers demand some attention, and that
is in regard to the ultimate constituents of the visible
world. There were supposed to be four primitive inde-
pendent substances or elements, namely, fire, air, earth,
and water, by the combination of which in different pro-
portions the most varied products could be obtained.
According to Empedocles, for example, flesh and blood
consist of equal parts of all four elements, while bones are
one-half fire, one-quarter earth, and one-quarter water.
Ihe word element applied to these primitive inde-
pendent substances has scarcely the same meaning as that
which we nowadays attach to it, and indeed Aristotle
regarded fire, air, earth, and water as the manifestation of
different properties carried about by one and the same
kind of matter. The four adjectives “warm,” “cold,”
“ dry,” and “ moist,” describe the fundamental qualities
which he supposed to be associated with this primordial
matter, and to each of the four elements were assigned
two of these properties. Air was represented as warm
and moist, water was moist and cold, earth was cold and
dry, fire was dry and warm.
All this seems very fantastic, but it was a way of
looking at things that was current for a long time after
Aristotle, indeed down to comparatively recent times.
We may well wonder whether the views which we
hold about the origin and composition of the natural
world will be thought equally fantastic by our scientific
descendants!
20