A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball
År: 1900
Forlag: The University Press
Sted: Cambride
Sider: 544
UDK: 531.1
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
124
THE THEORY OF SCREWS.
1134-
otherwise we should have at either intersection a twist velocity without any
kinetic energy. There is no similar restriction to the axis of pitch. We thus
see that O' must always lie inside the circle, but that 0 may be in any
part of the plane,
135. Conjugate Screws of Inertia.
We have already made much use of the conception of Conjugate Screws
of Inertia. We shall here approach the subject in a manner different from
that previously employed.
Let a be a screw about which a rigid body is twisting with a twist
velocity ä; let the body be simultaneously animated by a twist velocity ß
about a screw ß. These two will compound into a twist velocity 0 about
some screw 0. If the body only had the first twist velocity, its kinetic
energy would be Mua2a2. If it only had the second, the energy would be
Mufß2. When it has both twist velocities together, the kinetic energy is
Mue2&2. Generally it will not be true that the resulting kinetic energy is
equal to the sum of the components; but, under a special relation between
a and ß, we can have this equality; and as shown in § 88 under these cir-
cumstances a and ß are conjugate screws of inertia. The necessary condition
is thus expressed :—
'ufft2 = ua2a2 + ufß2.
We have now to prove the following important theorem :—
Aug chord through the pole of the axis of inertia intersects the representa-
tive circle in a pair of conjugate screws of inertia.
For we have
02 : a2 : ß2 :: AB2 : BX2 : AX2;
but if AB passes through the pole of the axis of inertia, then the centre of
gravity of masses — AB2 at X, + BX2 at A, and + AX2 at B, will lie on the
axis of inertia ; and, accordingly,
ABhtf = BX2ua2 + ^1 X‘2uf;
whence
Ug20'2 = M„2d- + Uß2ß2,
which proves the theorem.
Or we might have proceeded thus:—From Ptolemy’s theorem (fig. 19),
AB.XY = AX .BY+AY.BX-.
multiplying by AB . XO',
AB2. XY. XO'= AX. AB. BY. XO'+ AY. XO'. BX. AB;