A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball
År: 1900
Forlag: The University Press
Sted: Cambride
Sider: 544
UDK: 531.1
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
148
THE THEORY OF SCREWS.
[159
surface; it must also be reciprocal to all these; and, as there are only two
screws of the given pitch, it will follow that 9 must cut at right angles every
generator of the species A. The same would have to be true for any other
reciprocal screw </> similarly chosen; but it is obvious that two lines 9 and </>
cannot be found which will cut all the generators at right angles, unless,
indeed, in the extreme case when all these are coplanar and parallel. In the
general case it would require two common perpendiculars to two rays, which
is, of course, impossible. We hence see that S cannot be a surface of the
second degree.
We have thus demonstrated that $ must be at least of the third degree—
in other words, that a line which pierces the surface in two points will pierce
it in at least one more. Let a and ß be two screws on S of equal pitch m,
and let 9 be a screw of pitch — m which intersects a and ß. It follows that
9 is reciprocal both to a and ß, and therefore it must be reciprocal to
every screw of >8. Let 9 cut $ in a third point through which the screw 7 is
to be drawn, then 9 and 7 are reciprocal; but they cannot have equal and
opposite pitches, because then the pitch of 7 should be equal to that of a
and ß. We should thus have three screws on the surface of the same pitch,
which is impossible. It is therefore necessary that 9 shall always intersect 7
at right angles. From this it will be easily seen that S must be of the
third degree; for suppose that 9 intersected S in a fourth point, through
which a screw 8 passed, then 9 would have to be reciprocal to 8, because it is
reciprocal to all the screws of S; and it would thus be necessary for 9 to be
at right angles to 8. Take then the four rays a, ß, y, 8, and draw across
them the two common transversals 9 and </>. We can show, in like manner,
that is at right angles to y and 8. We should thus have 9 and <(6 as two
common perpendiculars to the two rays 7 and 8. This is impossible, unless
7 and 3 were in the same plane, and were parallel. If, however, y and 0 be
so circumstanced, then twists about them can only produce a resultant twist
also parallel to 7 and 8, and in the same plane. The entire surface S would
thus degenerate into a plane.
We are thus conducted to the result that $ must be a ruled surface
of the third degree, and we can ascertain its complete character. Since any
transversal 9 across a, ß, and 7 must be a reciprocal screw, if its pitch be
equal and opposite to those of a and ß, it will follow that each such trans-
versal must be at right angles to 7. This will restrict the situation of 7,
for unless it be specially placed with respect to a and ß, the transversal 9
will not always fulfil this condition. Imagine a plane perpendicular to 7,
then this plane contains a line I at infinity, and the ray 9 must intersect I as
the necessary condition that it cuts 7 at right angles. As 9 changes its
position, it traces out a quadric surface, and as I is one of the generators of
that quadric, it must be a hyperbolic paraboloid. The three rays a, ß, 7,