A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball
År: 1900
Forlag: The University Press
Sted: Cambride
Sider: 544
UDK: 531.1
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
308
THE THEORY OF SCREWS.
[290-
about some corresponding screw on A, and the two systems of screws would
have chiastic homography. If the body were given both in constitution
and in position, then, of course, there would be nothing arbitrary in the
choice of the corresponding screws. Suppose, however, that a screw rj had
been chosen arbitrarily on B to correspond to a screw a on 4, it would
then be generally possible to design and place a rigid body so that it should
begin to twist about a in consequence of the impulse on y. There would,
however, be no arbitrary element remaining in the homography. Thus, we
see that, while for homography, in general, three pairs of correspondents
can be arbitrarily assigned, there can only be two pairs so assigned for
chiastic homography, while for such a particular type as that which relates
to impulsive screws and the corresponding instantaneous screws, only one
pair can be arbitrarily chosen.
291. Case of Normal Cylindroids.
We have already had occasion (§ 118), to remark on the curious relation-
ship of two cylindroids when a screw can be found on either cylindroid which
is reciprocal to all the screws on the other. If, for the moment, we speak
of two such cylindroids as “ normal,” then we have the following theorem:—
Any homography of the screws on two cylindroids must be chiastic if
the two cylindroids are normal.
Let a, ß, 7 be any three screws on one cylindroid, and y, %, £ any three
screws on the other; then, since the cyliudroids are normal, we have
^ßi ^yn >
^a^ß( =
whence we obtain
unless therefore £ is reciprocal to ß, we must have
If, however, £ had been reciprocal to ß, then one of these screws (suppose ß)
must have been the screw on its cylindroid reciprocal to the entire group of
screws on the other cylindroid. In this case we must have
®rß7;=:0;
so that even in this case it would still remain true that
^a^ß^yf — ^a^ß^ya = 0.
It is, indeed, a noteworthy circumstance that, for any and every three pairs
of screws on two normal cylindroids, the relation just written must be
fulfilled.