A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball
År: 1900
Forlag: The University Press
Sted: Cambride
Sider: 544
UDK: 531.1
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
316
THE THEORY OF SCREWS.
[296-
from it by <p. In like manner if <£ be an impulsive screw corresponding to
p, as instantaneous screw we have another locus parallel to p for the centre
of gravity.
But as the centre of gravity is at infinity these two loci must there
intersect, i.e. they must be parallel and so must X and p, and hence all
instantaneous screws must be parallel.
Thus we see that all the screws on A must be parallel, i.e. that A must
have degraded into an extreme type of cylindroid.
297. Another extreme Case.
Given any two cylindroids A and P it is, as we have seen, generally
possible to correlate in one way the several screws on A to those on P so
that an impulsive wrench given to a certain rigid body about any screw on
P would make that body commence to move by twisting about its cor-
respondent on A. One case of failure has just been discussed. The case
now to be considered is not indeed one of failure but one in which a,ny
two pairs of screws on A and P will stand to each other in the desired
relations.
Suppose that A and P happened to fulfil the single condition that each
of them shall contain one screw which is reciprocal to the other cylindroid.
We have called the cylindroids so circumstanced “ normal.”
Let X be the screw on A which is reciprocal to every screw on P. If
then P and A are to stand to each other in the required relation, X must
be reciprocal to its impulsive screw. But this is only possible on one
condition. The mass of the body must be zero. In that case, if there is
no mass involved any one of the screws on P may be the impulsive screw
corresponding to any one of the screws on A.
Here again the question arises as to what becomes of the homographic
equation which defines so precisely the screw on P which corresponds to
the screws on A (§ 295). It might have been expected that in the case
of two normal cylindroids this homographic equation should become evan-
escent. But it does not do so.
But there is no real contradiction. The greater includes the less.
If every screw on P will suit as correspondent every screw on A then å
fortiori will the pairs indicated by the homography fulfil the conditions
requisite.
1’hat any two pairs of screws will be correspondents in this case is
obvious from the following.