A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball
År: 1900
Forlag: The University Press
Sted: Cambride
Sider: 544
UDK: 531.1
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
318J
THE GEOMETRICAL THEORY.
345
the fulfilment of two identical conditions among their coordinates. As
there are three pairs of correspondents, we see at once that there are six
equations to be fulfilled. These are exactly the number required for the
determination of y, %, %, in the system P.
To the same conclusion we might have been conducted by a different
line of reasoning. It is known that, for the complete specification of a
system of the third order, nine co-ordinates are necessary (§ 75). This is
the same number as is required for the specification of a rigid body. If,
therefore, we are given that P, a system of the third order, is the collection
of impulsive screws, corresponding to the instantaneous screws in the
system A.t we are given nine data towards the determination of a rigid
body, for which A and P would possess the desired relation. It therefore
follows that we have nine equations, while the rigid body involves nine
unknowns. Thus we are led to expect that the number of bodies, for which
the arrangement would be possible, is finite. When such a body is de-
termined, then of course the correlation of the screws on the two systems
is immediately accomplished. It thus appears that the general problem
of correlating the screws on any two given systems of the third order,
A and P, into possible pairs of impulsive screws and instantaneous screws,
ought not to admit of more than a finite number of solutions.
We are now to prove that this finite number of solutions cannot be
different from unity.
For, let us suppose that a screw X, belonging to A, had two screws
6 and <f>, as possible correspondents in P. This could, of course, in no case
be possible with the same rigid body. We shall show that it could not
even be possible with two rigid bodies, and M2. For, if two bodies could
do what is suggested, then it can be shown that there are a singly infinite
number of possible bodies, each of which would afford a different solution of
the problem.
We could design a rigid body in the following manner
Increase the density of every element of in the ratio of : 1, and
call the new mass M-[.
Increase the density of every element of M2 in the ratio of p2: 1, and
call the new mass M2.
Let the two bodies, so altered, be conceived bound rigidly together by
bonds which are regarded as imponderable.
Let be any screw lying on the cylindroid (0, </>), Then the impulsive
wrench of intensity, -i//" on xjr, may be decomposed into components
on 0 and 011 *•
Y sm(0-</>) sin(0 — </>)