A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball
År: 1900
Forlag: The University Press
Sted: Cambride
Sider: 544
UDK: 531.1
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
APPENDIX II.
501
regarded merely as a directed straight line with an associated linear magnitude
called the pitch. The screw has for us a dual aspect of much significance. No
small movement of the body is conceivable which does not consist of a twist
about a screw. No set of forces could be applied to the body which were not
equivalent to a wrench upon a screw. Everyone remembers the two celebrated
rules that forces are compounded like rotations and that couples are compounded
like translations. These may now be replaced by the single but far more com-
pendious rule which asserts that wrenches and twists are to be compounded by
identical laws. Would you unite geometry with generality in your dynamics?
It is by screws that you are enabled to do so.’
These ideas were rather too abstract for Cartesian, who remarked that, as
D’Alembert’s principle provided for everything in dynamics, screws could not be
needed. Mr Querulous sought to confirm him by saying that he did not see how
screws helped the study either of Foucault’s Pendulum or of the Precession of the
Equinoxes.
Such absurd observations kindled the intellectual wrath of One-to-One, who
rose and said, ‘ In the development of the natural philosopher two epochs may be
noted. At the first he becomes aware that problems exist. At the second he
discovers their solution. Querulous has not yet reached the first epoch; he cannot
even conceive those problems which the “ Theory of Screws ” proposes to solve.
I may, however, inform him that the “ Theory of Screws” is not a general dynami-
cal calculus. It is the discussion of a particular class of dynamical problems
which do not admit of any other enunciation except that which the theoi'y itself
provides. Let us hope that ere our labours have ended Mr Querulous may obtain
some glimmering of the subject.’ The chairman happily assuaged matters. ‘We
must pardon,’ he said, ‘ the vigorous language of our friend Mr One-to-One. His
faith in geometry is boundless—in fact he is said to believe that the only real
existence in the universe is anharmonic ratio.’
It was thus obvious that screws were indispensable alike for the application
of the forces and for the observation of the movements. Special measuring
instruments were devised by which the positions and pitches of the various
screws could be carefully ascertained. All being ready the first experiment was
commenced.
A screw was chosen quite at random, and a great impulsive wrench was ad-
ministered thereon. In the infinite majority of cases this would start the body
into activity, and it would commence to move in the only manner possible—i.e. it
would begin to twist about some screw. It happened, however, that this first
experiment was unsuccessful; the impulsive wrench failed to operate, or at all
events the body did not stir. ‘ I told you it would not do,’ shouted Querulous,
though he instantly subsided when One-to-One glanced at him.
Much may often be learned from an experiment which fails, and the chairman
sagaciously accounted for the failure, and in doing so directed the attention,
of the committee to an important branch of the subject. The mishap was
due, he thought, to some reaction of the constraints which had neutralised the
effect of the wrench. He believed it would save time in their future investi-