A Treatise on the Theory of Screws

Forfatter: Sir Robert Stawell Ball

År: 1900

Forlag: The University Press

Sted: Cambride

Sider: 544

UDK: 531.1

Søgning i bogen

Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.

Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.

Download PDF

Digitaliseret bog

Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.

Side af 579 Forrige Næste
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 511 except all rays save those contiguous to any one ray then the congruency may be regarded as linear. Hence any property of a linear congruency must apply to the Hamiltonian system as restricted in the proposition before us. A linear congruency is constituted by those screws of zero pitch whose coordinates satisfy two linear equations. They are the screws which belong to a 4-system and which each have zero pitch (§ 76). But we know that each such screw must intersect both of the screws of zero pitch on the cylindroid reciprocal to the 4-system (§ 212). It has also been shown that any transversal meeting two screws of equal pitch on a cylindroid must intersect at right angles a third screw on that surface (§ 22). Hence the shortest distance from any ray of the congruency to the axis of the cylindroid must lie on a generator of the cylindroid. This is however only true for one particular ray. Hamilton’s most instructive theorem shows, more generally, that the shortest distances between any specified ray R of the congruency and all the other contiguous rays have a conoidal cubic as their locus, such as might be represented by the equation % (a? + jr) = A x- + 2Bxy + G'f. There are two disposable quantities in the selection of the origin and the axis of x. If these quantities be so taken as to render .4 = 0; (7 = 0, then the equation is at once shown to represent a cylindroid of which R is the axis. Of course all rays of this congruency intersect two fixed rays, and the axis of the cylindroid must also intersect both of these rays. Möbius (A. F.)—Lehrbuch der Statik (Leipzig, 1837). This book is, we learn from the preface, one of the numerous productions to which the labours of Poinsot gave rise. The first part, pp. 1-355, discusses the laws of equilibrium of forces, which act upon a single rigid body. The second part, pp 1-313, discusses the equilibrium of forces acting upon several rigid bodies connected together. The characteristic feature of the book is its great generality. I here enunciate some of the principal theorems. If a number of forces acting upon a free rigid body be in equilibrium, and if a straight line of arbitrary length and position be assumed, then the algebraic sum of the teti-ahedra, of which the straight line and each of the forces in succession are pairs of opposite edges, is equal to zero (p. 94). If four forces are in equilibrium they must be generators of the same hyper- boloid (p. 177). If five forces be in equilibrium they must intersect two common straight lines (p. 179). If the lines of action of five forces be given, then a certain plane $ through any point P is determined. If the five forces can be equilibrated by one force through P, then this one force must lie in 6' (p. 180). To adopt the notation of Professor Cayley, we denote by 12 the perpendicular distance between two lines 1, 2, multiplied into the sine of the angle between them (Comptes Rendus, Vol. Ixi., pp. 829-830 (1865)). Mobius shows (p. 189) that if forces along four lines 1, 2, 3, 4 equilibrate, the intensities of these forces are proportional to 723724734, 713714734, ^12 . 14 . 24, J12713.23. It is also shown that the product of the forces on 1 and 2, multiplied by 12, is equal to the product of the forces on 3 and 4 multiplied by 34. He hence deduces Chasles’ theorem (Liouville’s Journal, 1st Ser., Vol. xii., p. 222 (1847)), that the volume of the tetrahedron formed by two of the forces is equal to that formed by the remaining two.