Motor Road Transport For Commercial Purposes
(Liquid Fuel, Steam, Electricity)
Forfatter: John Phillimore
År: 1920
Forlag: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd.
Sted: London
Sider: 212
UDK: 629.113
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
FUEL, SPARE PARTS, ETC.
147
well if the running charges were lumped together
and not separated under their various heads. This
matter is of considerable importance and affects the
efficiency of a service very much.
Economy may be effected in fuel consumption in
the case of internal combustion engined vehicles by
divers means, such as the fitting of an extra air or
spraying device ; by the mixture of benzole with the
petrol; or by the employment of some soundly designed
atomizer or paraffin carburettor, such as is hereafter
described.
The author would like to add a word of warning
in connection with this subject, namely, that those
responsible for the service should make sure that the
vans are not run habitually on too rich a mixture.
Not only is this wasteful in fuel, but its evil effect on
the engine is great, and increased expenditure will not
be confined to the fuel item alone, but will extend to
those of lubricating oil and repairs. Care should be
taken to prevent waste in the storage of fuel and in
the Alling up of the tanks on the vans.
With the steam wagon and electric vehicle, tlie
number of cwts. of fuel or of units of elcctricity used
per working day, and their costs, should also be
recorded in detail.
In the case of the steamer, coke will very often prove
a more economical fuel than coal. Generally speaking,
the former is cheaper and—even in comparison to
best Welsh steam coal—considerably cleaner.
Since the quality of coke varies to a considerable
extent the steam wagon owner will be wise if he
experiments until he finds a kind suitable to his
machine.
One disadvantage—which may in some cases prove
a determining factor against the use of the cheaper
fuel—is that it is more bulky than coal.