Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume I
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Sider: 448
UDK: 600 Eng -gl.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
110
ENGINEERING WONDERS OF THE WORLD.
Fig. 9.—FRONT FACE OF A HUDSON TUNNEL SHIELD
at the end of its journey. (Its battered condi-
tion testifies to its hard service.) Fig. 10.—con-
crete-lined APPROACH SECTION IN ROCK, LOWER
HUDSON TUNNELS. Fig. 11.—SURFACE VIEW OF A
tunnel cave-in in soft ground. (This occurred
in the Weehawken or west approach section of the
Pennsylvania Hudson River Tunnel, where it
passes under the Erie Railway freight yards.)
cutting away as much of the balloon as had
settled into the opening, could build a chamber,
with the help of 42 lbs. air pressure. Then
the shield was erected ; soon it was pushing
ahead toward New York, and a substantial
cast-iron lining was erected behind it as it
proceeded.
The work progressed rapidly, as much as
ten feet in a day. By the fall of 1891 the north
tunnel had been extended to nearly 4,000 feet
from the New Jersey shore. Then suddenly
the great Baring Brothers’ failure in London
cut off the money supply, and the work
stopped.
Another period of ten years of idleness
followed, and again new hands took up the
work. In 1902 Charles M. Jacobs, who eight
years before had directed the
East River Gas Tunnel, took
the Mud.
charge. His skill was soon
tested, for the shields encountered rock—a
submerged peak near the New York shore.
To blast out the sloping rock in the lower
part of the face, while the top of the shield
was still in flowing mud, was a task of the
same kind as recounted above for the Gas
Tunnel. By extending the horizontal plat-
form forward at mid-height of the shield to
form a protecting apron (Fig. 7), the work
was accomplished successfully, though very
slowly. On a part of this rock work also the
novel plan of baking the mud face with torches,
to prevent it from flowing, was used. Dump-
ing clay in the river to form a thicker and
less porous cover over the tunnel was also
necessary at times. In 1904 the shield of the
north tunnel met the short heading which had
been driven west from the New York shaft.
A beautifully effective method marked the
progress of the south tunnel, which had mean-
while also been taken in hand. When its
shield was well started in the
j .v . Phenomenal
river mud, the engineers con-
i •
ceived the bold idea that it
would not be necessary to cjig out the soft