History of the Typewriter
Forfatter: Geo. Carl Mares
År: 1909
Forlag: Guilbert Pitman
Sted: London
Sider: 318
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
—182—
presence, we holding the watch and timing the operation.
The work was transcribed on the machine, with an ease
and elegance never yet surpassed by any sighted operator.
The delicate touch of the operator gathered in every dot.
Her nimble fingers outpaced the tongue of the dictator.
The operator was a rival whom the most skilful typist
might envy.
With reference to the use of the typewriter proper
by the blind, it is known that in the early days of the
Remington in this country, the machine was stated
to be especially useful to blind persons to enable them to
hold correspondence with sighted persons, and in the early
days of the machine someone invented a framework to
be laid over the keyboard for the purpose of affording a
guide to the correct keys. In Bates Torrey’s Practical
Typewriting there is a special section devoted to this subject,
and a mass of useful instruction in the method of fingering
recommended by the author of the book is presented.
Among many illustrations is an elaborate piece of tabular
work executed by a pupil of the Perkins Institute at Boston
(Mass.), a young man, totally blind, who had been using
the machine for less than a year. Mr. J. W. Smith, the
Superintendent of the Perkins Institution, thus expresses
himself in connection with the relative abilities of the
blind and sighted, “ Take two persons of equal ability,
one sighted and the other blind, and I will guarantee the
latter will surpass the other in attaining facility in the use
of the machine within any given time.” No one will, we
think, begrudge the opportunity for bread winning held out
by the typewriter, when the world is wide for the seeing,
but those who work in darkness have but a narrow field
of labour.