Niagara Falls 100.000-Hp. Development
Forfatter: J. Allen Johnson, G.W. Hewitt, W.J. Foster, R.B. Williamson, F.D. Newbury, Louis S. Bernstein, O.D. Dales, W.M. White, Lewis F. Moody, George R. Shepard, John L. Harper
År: 1920
Sider: 46
UDK: 621.209 H Gl. Sm.
DOI: 10.48563/dtu-0000095
Reprinted from Electrical World and Engineering News-Record
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
Niagara Falls 1 00,000 Hp. Development
[ 39
600,000-Hp. Line Delivers Niagara Power
Six Circuits Spaced for 88,000 Volts Are Supported on
Cantilevers Overhanging Hydraulic Canal—Special
Precautions to Guard Against Failure
By J. ALLEN JOHNSON
Electrical engineer Niagara Falls Power Company
| ^HE problem of transmitting the 100,000 hp.
generated in the Niagara Falls extension was
I complicated by many factors. In the first
place the prospective load for this develop-
ment was concentrated within a comparatively narrow
area adjacent to the upper river, so that it was neces-
sary that the entire output should be transmitted in a
single direction. The city has few available streets
leading in the desired direction, and most of these were
already occupied by conduit systems.
As a second consideration, the character of the load,
which has a daily load factor of over 95 per cent (the
power being mostly used for electrochemical and electro-
metallurgical purposes), is the worst possible for under-
ground transmission because the constant generation
of heat in the cables causes a considerable reduction in
their transmitting capacity compared with that on a
system of low load factor.
As a third consideration, a glance into the future
indicated the probability of a much larger transmission
of Niagara power to Buffalo in the not distant future,
requiring a much higher voltage than that used for local
distribution. In this event the proper location for the
step-up transformers would be close to the generating
station. A 3-mile (4.2-km.) underground transmission
to Echota, the center of load, at generator voltage
before stepping up would be economically unsound.
Furthermore it appeared very probable that additional
development of power at this point would be required
in order to meet the double demand for more power
on the one hand and increased economy in use of water
on the other. Overhead transmission would permit the
necessary high voltage for long-distance transmission
and would also provide the necessary flexibility to care
for future increases in power development, either by-
adding more circuits or by raising the transmission
voltage. In addition to all other considerations, cost
estimates showed a differential in favor of overhead
transmission of about one to three, which under the
existing conditions of high costs was an extremely im-
portant consideration. Fortunately, the company already
possessed in its canal right-of-way through the city a
possible outlet for overhead lines if a way could be
found to utilize it without interfering with its use as
a waterway. As finally constructed the transmission
line has a length of 16,000 ft. (4,800 m.) and runs
from the terminal building up the canal to the river,
thence following the bank past the plant of the old
Niagara Falls Power Company (now known as the
Niagara plant) and finally turning away from the river
again at Echota to connect with the Echota substation.
The solution of the transmission problem was greatly
facilitated by the consolidation of the two power com-
panies inasmuch as land for the location of the line for
the greater part of its length was already in possession
of one or the other of them. For a distance of approxi-
mately 4,000 ft. (1,200 m.) through the heart of the
city, however, it was necessary to make use of the
property already occupied by the hydraulic canal. The
accompanying halftone illustrations show clearly how
this was accomplished by means of steel cantilevers
anchored into massive concrete foundations on one bank
of the canal, upon which were erected the six-circuit
transmission towers.
For the greater part of the distance it was only found
necessary for the narrow bases of the towers to be
placed over the canal right-of-way, easement being ob-
tained from abutting property owners for the over-
hanging portion of the construction. At the large
bridge spanning the canal at the junction of Third and
Niagara Streets, however, this was not possible, and it
was necessary to place two towers entirely over the
canal. This was accomplished by means of cantilevers
extra heavily braced.
The main horizontal members of this structure are
composed of two 30-in. (75-cm.) I beams, each 60 ft.
(18 m.) long, placed side by side. Thirty feet (9 m.)
FIG. 53—ROUTES FOLLOWED BY PRINCIPAL TIE LINES AND
FEEDERS OF NIAGARA FALLS SYSTEM
of these beams is buried in the massive concrete foun-
dation, the other 30 ft. projecting out over the canal.
In these structures the center line of the towers is
25 ft. (7.5 m.) from the face of the canal wall. A heavy
brace was added to these special structures to give
stability and rigidity, although not needed for strength.
In the case of the short cantilevers the brace was
omitted.
In addition to the special narrow-base towers used on
the canal section, the local conditions called for the use
of several other types of structure. In full-strain posi-
tions three different types were employed, the stand-
ard-strain type, portal strain, and two-circuit strain.
Between strain points the line is supported on flexible
steel bents of portal construction.
The portal type of construction was used for the
section along the river bank where the line is built
over a future street. For a distance of approximately
1,000 ft. (300 m.) the land which this street is to
occupy has not yet been filled in, and the towers were
erected on heavy concrete abutments constructed in the