The New York Rapid-transit Subway
Forfatter: Willialm Barclay Parsons
År: 1908
Forlag: The Institution
Sted: London
Sider: 135
UDK: 624.19
With An Abstract Of The Discussion Upon The Paper.
By Permission of the Council. Excerpt Minutes of Proceedings of The Institute of Civil Engineers. Vol. clxxiii. Session 1907-1908. Part iii
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
96
DISCUSSION ON NEW YORK SUBWAY.
[Minutes of
Mr. Hudleston. tunnel, and a tunnel was more costly than a tube. After that, care
would be required to get round the Middle Level sewer, although it
might be managed ; but at Lancaster Gate the task would become
hopeless. A large sewer crossed there just below the road-surface,
the Middle Level sewer was immediately below, and the subway would
then have to change into a tube or deep tunnel again. After that
it would get on fairly well, and formerly it could have reached Chancery
Lane without much trouble, because the County Council subway did
not then exist. Then cameHolborn Viaduct, which could not be passed
except by tunnelling, and the remainder of the distance would have
to be finished off practically in tunnel. Of all tubes the Central
London was perhaps the one that had been constructed on a route
which would strike an ordinary man as being an ideal one for
subways, but looking at the matter closely, it was practically impos-
sible to adopt that form of construction. He was of opinion that if
anything more were done in London within the 4-mile radius it must
be practically a tube. Outside the 4-mile radius subways could be
constructed J and a little farther out it would be really cheaper in
most cases to buy the land and make an ordinary open railway.
Mr.Boardman. Mr. W. H- BOARDMAN observed that the losses and annoyance
to the public in Fourth Avenue, Forty-second Street and Upper
Broadway during the period of construction had been not at all
exaggerated; nevertheless, that did not prove everything. In Upper
Broadway at every cross street wide passages were made, so that the
whole street was not obstructed. Amsterdam Avenue was near by,
and there were other broad avenues leading to the north. It was in
fact a case of the suffering of the few for the benefit of the many.
The outrages on Fourth Avenue and Forty-second Street were
inexcusable ; the loss to property-owners, dealers, and others had been
severe. The subsequent construction, from the City Hall to below
Wall Street, which had been alluded to by one of the speakers, had
been done without any annoyance whatever to the public. He
would not describe the metliod except to say that a little of the
cover was moved each night, and all that the man in the street
saw was the substitution of tliick plank paving for the ordinary
paving. On the curb-line a longitudinal wooden trestle was
placed, with exhaust-pipes to take the material away. Except for
that, the pedestrian and vehicular traffic was unimpeded. Safety
in operation had not been alluded to in the discussion. Where
electricity was used for power purposes intense heat arose
from short-circuiting, and two instances had occurred already. In
one case only employees were concerned, and they took care of
themselves; and in the otlier case a train-load of passengers came to