The New York Rapid-transit Subway
Forfatter: Willialm Barclay Parsons
År: 1908
Forlag: The Institution
Sted: London
Sider: 135
UDK: 624.19
With An Abstract Of The Discussion Upon The Paper.
By Permission of the Council. Excerpt Minutes of Proceedings of The Institute of Civil Engineers. Vol. clxxiii. Session 1907-1908. Part iii
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
Proceedings.] DISCUSSION ON NEW YORK SUBWAY.
103
i e TAwdon had been Mr. Cuning-
seemed that the beautiful homogeneous clay of London had been ham.
designed by Nature for the very purpose of having tunnels pierced
through .it, and it would be a great pity to balk Nature in he
design. The simplicity with which the tubes were constructed
was wonderful, and the absolute non-disturbance of the streets
through which the tubes passed was an incalculable point
their favour. For instance, while the tube was being constructed
under Regent Street, of all the millions of people who passed along
that street during the construction he did not suppose there were a
hundred who knew what was going on down below. Picturing the
scene if there had been an open cut, with all the water-pipes, gas-
pipes and sewers removed, one could scarcely imagine the outcry of the
people of London, and even of people throughout the world, at such an
intolerable disturbance. But the construction of a tube went on wi i
absolute simplicity and with the greatest ease. Mr. Hudleston had
given some figures relating to the cost of construction, and MIr.
Cuningham thought he was not far wrong in saying that the cost
a tube 11 feet 6 inches or 12 feet in diameter could be calculated at
about £34 per lineal yard, which came to about £60,000 per sing e
mile, or about £120,000 per double mile.1 It would cost a great deal
more than €120,000 per mile, in constructing an open cut along
Oxford Street, to remove and relay all the gas-pipes, water-pipes, an
sewers; and that was a very strong point in favour of tube construc-
tion. One thing that had been urged against tubes was that the air
was not good. He had seen the Subway in New York,and the air was
not good there ; there had been a tremendous outcry among the people
of New York about the condition of the atmosphere, and great diffi-
culty had been found in improving it, because the various openings
in the side of the subway prevented any pumping out. The heat
of the subway became intolerable in the hot weather, and there
were no means of cooling it. The ventilation of a tube was a simple
matter. The proper place for such ventilation was, in his opinion,
midway between the stations, and not at the stations themselves.
A shaft could not be constructed in the street ; but it was possible to
have a horizontal shaft connected with the top of the tube, running
back 200 feet or 300 feet to a convenient backyard, where a vertical
shaft might be erected, and the atmosphere could be changed by means
of a fan, which could work at all times while the trains were running
If that were done, a great deal of the objection to the atmosphere of
the tubes would be overcome. As a matter of fact, on the Central
* That is, for the tube alone, lined complete, but without permanent way and
not including the cost of any land.—G.C.C.