The New York Rapid-transit Subway
Forfatter: Willialm Barclay Parsons
År: 1908
Forlag: The Institution
Sted: London
Sider: 135
UDK: 624.19
With An Abstract Of The Discussion Upon The Paper.
By Permission of the Council. Excerpt Minutes of Proceedings of The Institute of Civil Engineers. Vol. clxxiii. Session 1907-1908. Part iii
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
Proceedings.] DISCUSSION ON NEW YORK SUBWAY.
117
The Author desired to thank the two Past-Presidents who had The Aut
spoken for the very flattering remarks they had made with regard to
him. He appreciated the compliment in Sir John Wolfe Barrys
claim that he was half an Englishman ; but Sir John had not stated
whether it was the better or the poorer half he claimed for England.
It was a source of regret to him that Sir William White had not
mentioned, when paying his second visit to the subway, that he was
sailing next morning, because had he done so he would have found
just as much difficulty in getting through it as on his first visit.
Replying to the discussion, he gladly acknowledged, in response
to a suggestion by Sir John Wolfe Barry, the benefits derived in the
preliminary study of the various underground railways in London,
and especially of the very instructive work executed by Sir John
himself. The point raised by that speaker in regard to the unit-
stresses permitted in the roof- and wall-beams had been answered by
Colonel Yorke, regardless of the additional strength of the concrete
arching, which, as the experiments described on p. 41 showed,
amounted to an increase in resistance of one-third. The reinforce-
ment of the side walls, thus admitting of thinner construction, not
only economized space so as to permit work in a narrow street
otherwise impossible, as Sir John Wolfe Barry had pointed out, but
was also a cheaper form of construction. Sir William White and other
speakers had referred to the Transit Board. Without such a board
and the concentration of power, the subway would have been
impossible of accomplishment. The growth of a modern city, and
the comfort and welfare of its inhabitants, depended largely on
facilities for internal transportation. Unfortunately, there existed a
feeling on the part of some people that the granting of any special
privileges benefited only a private corporation, and that no
privileges should be granted, but taxes and other burdens should
be imposed. The public was more vitally interested in the building
of interurban railways than were investors. For the sake of the
public, therefore, all possible aid should be given to reduce the cost,
burdensome at best, in order to induce construction, perhaps even
going to the extent, as Mr. Macassey had pointed out, of not
permitting vested rights to impose a veto. Mr. Davison had inquired
as to the laws and the necessary steps to acquire powers under
which the subway had been built. There was but one law, that
creating the Rapid Transit Commission and conferring upon it all
authority necessary to lay out and construct the railway with the
City’s money. After the location had been approved by the city
authorities, the Board had power, by mandamus proceedings if
necessary, to compel the finance department to pay the cost; and it