The New York Rapid-transit Subway
Forfatter: Willialm Barclay Parsons
År: 1908
Forlag: The Institution
Sted: London
Sider: 135
UDK: 624.19
With An Abstract Of The Discussion Upon The Paper.
By Permission of the Council. Excerpt Minutes of Proceedings of The Institute of Civil Engineers. Vol. clxxiii. Session 1907-1908. Part iii
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
Proceedings.] CORRESPONDENCE ON NEW YORK SUBWAY.
Transit Company to make a study of the sanitary condition of the Dr. Soper,
air and ventilation of subways in Europe, a task which occupied
about 3 months in the summer of 1907. During this final investi-
gation, practically all the large subways in Europe were visited.
The principal results of the inquiry were the following. The air
of the New York subway did not differ much from the air of most
subways, as far as he was aware, except as to temperature and
dust. The temperature was high because of the extraordinarily
large amount of heat generated by the consumption of electrical
energy; the heat from the bodies of the passengers had practically
nothing to do with it. The most objectionable feature of the heat
was less the actual elevation of temperature than the fact that the
subway remained warm continually while the city streets became
relatively cool during the nights and mornings of summer. It
was at such times that the greatest inconvenience was experienced
from the heat. In winter the heat given off by the trains was
advantageous, since, if low temperatures occurred they would, with
the strong draughts, render the air uncomfortable. The hottest week
during the period of the writer’s investigation was that of the 4th-
10th August, 1905. The average daily temperature in the subway
during that week was 83 -4° F.; in the streets 78-2°; difference 5-2°.
Averages for 18 weeks were given in Fig. 24. The relative humidity
was slight. The actual weight, or tension, of aqueous vapour was
practically the same in the New York subway as in the air of the
streets under which the subway ran. Since the temperature was
higher in the subway, the humidity there was less noticeable, this