The New York Rapid-transit Subway
Forfatter: Willialm Barclay Parsons
År: 1908
Forlag: The Institution
Sted: London
Sider: 135
UDK: 624.19
With An Abstract Of The Discussion Upon The Paper.
By Permission of the Council. Excerpt Minutes of Proceedings of The Institute of Civil Engineers. Vol. clxxiii. Session 1907-1908. Part iii
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
34 PARSONS ON NEW YORK RAPID-TRANSIT SUBWAY. [Minutes of
or the side-wall column is 1 foot 3 inches. Wherever a curve would
bring the sides or end of a car nearer to a wall or column than that
distance the track-span was widened correspondingly.
Methods of Dealing with Sub-surface Structures.
The greatest difficulty to be overcome in building a shallow subway
is the disposal of the sub-surface structures. In this respect New
York does not differ materially from London or any other large city,
except that there are found, in addition to other structures occurring
elsewhere, elevated-railway piers and a very complex surface tram-
way-system.
House-vaults were held not to be property, but only a revocable
license from the city. The owners therefore received as compensa-
tion only the price paid originally to the city for the right of use.
A few instances dated back to colonial and early times, when the
original price was stated in bushels of wheat. The city repaid not
in kind but in the marlset value of the grain on the date of
settlement.
The elevated structures where encountered were carried by
temporary supports, and the foundations were then removed. In
making a permanent connection between the column and the roof of
the subway two different methods were used, either reinforced con-
crete or the standard beam construction. In reinforced concrete
there were built in the side walls two 12-inch 40-Ib. beams, spaced
5 feet between centres and symmetrical with the centre-line of the
column to be carried. Resting on these girders and carried to the
first row of bulb-angle columns were two 24-inch 90-lb. I beams
with four 12-inch 314-lb. I beams set between them, resting on
the lower flanges and covering a total span about 5 feet square,
q-inch rods for construction purposes passing through the webs
of the main I beams to hold them together (Fig. 19, Plate 6).
The large and small I beams were then encased in concrete, an
ordinary layer of waterproofing being placed on top, carrying a concrete
pyramid 6 feet or 7 feet square at the bottom, to distribute the load
of the elevated column above. The small I beams were probably
not necessary, being introduced in Brooklyn at the request of
the officers of the Elevated Company. The mass of concrete
suffices to distribute the load over the main I beams without
bringing any stress on the small beams. In beam construction the
supporting structure was built in the ordinary manner, except that
the roof-beams that came beneath the elevated columns were made
of heavier section.