The New York Rapid-transit Subway
Forfatter: Willialm Barclay Parsons
År: 1908
Forlag: The Institution
Sted: London
Sider: 135
UDK: 624.19
With An Abstract Of The Discussion Upon The Paper.
By Permission of the Council. Excerpt Minutes of Proceedings of The Institute of Civil Engineers. Vol. clxxiii. Session 1907-1908. Part iii
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
60
DISCUSSION ON NEW YORK SUBWAY.
[Minutes of
Whitealiam surmounted, but it would be interesting if the Author would state
whether it had been serious or exaggerated, and also how the
ventilation was dealt with. To anyone visiting the line it seemed
almost certain that the motion of the trains and the free access to
the outer air would make the problem of ventilation a simple one, but
he would be much obliged if the Author would state what the facts
were. He thought Sir John Wolfe Barry had sufficiently expressed
the importance attaching to the Paper and its wealtli of detail, but
he was sure that those who read it in the Proceedings would agree
with the members present in saying that the Author had conferred
upon them the greatest possible kindness in coming himself to
England while the Paper was being read, and in placing at the
disposal of The Institution such a mass of valuable information.
Mr. Ross. Mr. A. Ross, having been one of those who had the great pleasure
and benefit of joining the party which was so well received all over
the States, especially in New York, desired to say that the attention
paid to them on their visit to the works of the Subway, then
coming to a conclusion as regarded its inner lengths, was extremely
courteous and profitable. The Author spared no pains or trouble
in giving details and information which would be likely to
interest the party. As regarded the Paper itself, the conditions
regulating the means of transport in New York and the conditions
in London were entirely different. London was a huge area enclosed
by an outline resembling a complete circle, the radius of which was
about 5 miles. All the traffic to and from London converged at
some point within that circle, generally speaking on a base-line
which extended from the City to Victoria Station. As in all large
towns, the traffic consisted of a vast influx of people in the mornings,
and a similar exodus in the evenings, with a general flow up
and down throughout the day. New York, on the other hand,
was enclosed in what might be called a great parallelogram about
14 miles in length and only 13 mile in width. There the traffic in
the morning was from north to south, practically all of it going
to the business quarter at the extreme south, while in the afternoon
and evening the traffic was all the other way. In both cases
there must be a more or less even traffic either way during
the day. The conditions for laying out a railway in those cases
must be entirely different. With regard to the question of sub-
soil, in London there was a great depth of London clay under-
lying the surface, whereas in New York there was the hardest
material imaginable—gneiss rock. There could be no doubt that
the fact that London clay was an easily-penetrated material had led
up to the construction of the tube railways. The shield had been