The Madsen Machine Gun
År: 1918
Sider: 32
UDK: 623
This copy reprinted in Copenhagen by Jensen & Rønager
Reprinted in 1920
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
11
The Madsen
[LORDS]
dun.
12
not have the requisite tools and gauges—
industrials who are making things not ab-
solutely necessary for the war. That is my
proposal.
My third proposal is to grasp the thing
and s&t up a factory exclusively for ma-
king this gun in this country. Of one thing
I am certain. Unless you take this gun
up, and if the enemy should get it, they
will beat you. That is as certain as that
I stand here. I say that from my know-
ledge of machine-guns and the long prac-
tice I have had with them. These are the
suggestions I make to the Government. I
know their difficulties, but there is no
reason why the difficulties should not be
faced. They must lay themselves out some-
how to get hold of this gun, because, as
I say, if the enemy get hold of if they
will beat you. Of that I am satisfied. It
is a gun superior to other guns in every
one of the particulars to which I have
alluded.
I want the Government to answer cer-
tain questions. I want to know why were
the orders given for the supply of this
Danish gun turned down? Two factories,
I think, were started in this country for
the making of this gun, under the orders
of the present Prime Minister. They were
stopped in 1916. They were actually begun
and money spent on them. Why were they
stopped? I want to know why, when the
Danish gun was strongly recommended
more particularly by Cavalry men after
they had seen it and tested it working
with other guns in exhaustive trial, it was
not given to the Cavalry. The authorities
state that it is impossible that we could
get this gun. I want to know why. Noth-
ing is impossible. You cannot say that
we had made these contracts and must
go through with this other gun. They can
argue that if they take this Madsen gun
while they are so pressed for machine-guns
the step will temporarily stop a certain
supply. I agree, but the same thing ap-
plies in ordinary industrials. In the indu-
strial with which I have been connected,
if we put up a tool that cost £1,500 we
scrapped it in six months because we
could put up a tool with a bigger output.
We were wise. All those who are connected
with manufactories know that that is the
principle. The principle is to get the out-
put. Scrap all your tools, but not before you
Lord Beresford.
have got other to put in their place. In
this case you can put this in its place in
an incredibly short time. Taking the ba-
lance you. should run this little risk of
not being able to continue your supply of
so many thousands a week as that you
may get an infinitely superior weapon,
which, when you get it, will enable you
to shorten the war. The Brazilians have
this gun in large numbers. That is the
gun of the old pattern. The Bulgarians
have 600 of them. The Germans have some
of them, but they are of the old pattern
which do not fire the same ammunition
as the Infantry. If your Lordships go to
the War Exhibition you will see one of
these guns which came from Bulgaria. It
was actually taken by some of our men
in battle.
There is another point which I wish to
bring before your Lordships, and it is a
very material point. The authorities who
have turned down this gun have never
seen it—not one of them. They might have
seen the gun in a room, but they have
never seen it under trial in practice with
the men drilling it, and they have not
seen it fired. That is all wrong. The autho-
rities should not decide that they cannot
have this gun because they have contracts
or because the supply may be temporarily
or infinitesimally stopped. They have not
seen the gun. The gun is so superior that
anybody who looks at it, whether or not
he knows anything about a gun or a rifle,
•will see what an extraordinary weapon it
is and how necessary it is that we should
put it in our men’s hands. The authorities
have turned it down though every single
expert, no matter who he was, of both
Services has been loud in his praise of
the gun. The Army in France has never
seen the gun, and I do not believe the
Commander-in-Chief even has. He has not
seen it tried. With all the advantages I
have enumerated I must ask the Govern-
ment to be good enough to give me a
clear explanation why this gun has not
been adopted, and I hope they will give
your Lordships some indication that they
i are going to do their best to meet the
j difficulties, which I acknowledge they
labour under, and get this gun put into
■ the British Army as soon as ever it can.
It will do more to end the war than any
1 other weapon we can produce.