The Madsen Machine Gun
År: 1918
Sider: 32
UDK: 623
This copy reprinted in Copenhagen by Jensen & Rønager
Reprinted in 1920
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
1
The Madsen
[6 June 1918]
Gun.
2
THE MADSEN GUN.
Lord BERESFORD had the following
Question on the Paper—
To ask His Majesty’s Government—
1. Whether information can be given
relative to the Danish Madsen ma-
chine-gun.
2. Whether the Danish Madsen gun
weighs only 15 lbs. as compared with,
the Lewis gun of 28% lbs., the Hotch-
kiss gun of 28 lbs., and the Vickers
gun 68 lbs., including mountings.
3. Whether the Danish Madsen gun is
superior in every respect to the Le-
wis and Hotchiss guns now in use.
4. Whether (except for aircraft) the
Lewis and Hotchkiss guns are no
longer in use with any Army other
than the British, and if it is a fact
that these guns have been super-
seded even in the countries of their
origin, v i z., America and France.
5. Whether the Danish Madsen gun was
tested in 1915 at the Machine Gun
School in France, and strongly recom-
mended.
6. Whether the Commandei’-in-Chief has
asked for 2,000 Danish Madsen guns
to be immediately ordered for issue
to the troops.
7. Whether the official report of the
H.M.S. »Excellent,« Whale Island, is
not strongly in favour of the Danish
Madsen gun.
8. Whether the newest model of the
Danish Madsen gun was tested by
the Small Arms Committee at the
School of Musketi'y, Hythe, in Ja-
nuary, 1918, with the most satisfac-
tory results.
9. Whether the Danish Madsen gun was
tested in May, 1918, before a very-
great number of machine-gun experts
of the Army, and whether these
experts have reported on the gun,
unanimously, and strongly recom-
mending it.
10. Whether the Ministry öf Munitions
has had the Danish Madsen gun
thoi’oughly tested, and recommended
it to be introduced into the Service.
11. Whether the present Prime Minister,
when Minister of Munitions, ordered
5,000 Danish Madsen guns to be
manufactured for the Army.
12. If it can be stated why this Danish
Madsen gun, which has been proved
superior in all respects and admir-
ably suited for Infantry, Cavalry,
Aircraft, and other Arms, has not
yet been taken into the British Ser-
vice; and to move a Resolution.
The noble and gallant Lord said: My .
Lords, I have rather a considerable string
of questions on the Paper. I have to
apologise for that fact, but I find that in
technical matters, unless you place on the
Paper all yo.u. want to know, it is very hard
for the Government to answer you. The
subject that I wish to bring before your
Lordships’ House is one of vital impor-
tance. In my opinion if the gun which I
am going to describe is not adopted, it
may end in defeat for our forces, and it
will most certainly end in the prolongation
of the war. The gun in question is named
the Danish Madsen gun. It was invented
in 1905, and has been through various
stages of alteration and improvement until
now its accuracy and manufacture are
such that no fault whatever can be found
with it.
Perhaps your Lordships will allow me to
state my qualifications for attempting on
this occasion to be a machine-gun expert.
Some thirty years ago I was so impressed
with the value of the machine-gun that I
invented the galloping machine-gun for the
Cavalry. That gun was invented by me to
solve certain difficulties such as Cavalry
being sent on to ridges, bridges, and cross-
roads to hold them. In many cases they
could not hold those places when the
enemy’s Infantry came up, but with six of
these guns they could hold the positions,
if once they got them, until their own
Infantry came ,up. Cavalry officers of that
day were very pleased with the gun. They
were most anxious to get it, and I think
a noble Lord in this House who was then
in the 10th Lancers will support me in
saying that that regiment when it got the
gun first was extremely pleased to have it.
At one moment I was the only man alive,
I believe, who had fought in action with
machine-guns both ashore and. afloat.
That reminds me of an incident. A
foreign gentleman came over with regard
to the Gatling gun, which had a better
feed, and offered me a large sum of money