On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
10
largely reduced in length, thus economising flooring, hand-railing
and area of ground occupied. This, it may be added, has been
done in several more recent structures of a similar kind.
A third case of unfavourable support is where the girder seat
is not placed centrally to the cylinder or column. This causes
the stress to be greater on one side of the column, than the other,
and involves a tendency for the column, to lean over if in soft
ground. An instance of this is to be seen in an important
bridge illustrated in “Engineering,” vol. 43, p. 117.
Such errors as these are usually irremediable in. existing
structures. It is desirable, however, to guard against their
repetition in future designs.
4. Imperfect expansion apparatus.—Variations of temperature
affect all metal structures, and unless properly provided for
may cause extra stresses of serious amount in the metal work
and dislocation of the brickwork or masonry of the supports,
such dislocation unfortunately being only too apparent in. not
a few existing structures. The extreme temperature range in
Melbourne from the Observatory thermometer records is about
150° Fahrenheit, but it is not probable that the change of
temperature of considerable masses of metal work such as used
in bridges will be more than 120°. As iron and steel expand
not quite one part in 800 between freezing and boiling, a range
of 180°, the expansion for 120° will be one part in 1200 or 1 inch
in 100 feet. This simple and easily remembered rule is safe for
the Victorian, climate, but would not suffice for places such as
New York, where the temperature range is greater in both
directions than in Melbourne.
A metal structure then should be anchored or fixed at some
definite point and be allowed free movement everywhere else.
The point of anchorage may advantageously be near the centre,
so as to divide up the motion. If this is not convenient the
anchorage should be at the firmest or most solid support. If for
example one end of a bridge be on solid rock and the other on a
tall and somewhat flexible support, the former should be made
the anchorage. At the Victoria Street Bridge, near Melbourne,
the opposite course was adopted and the whole bridge was
thrown somewhat out of position by movement of the support
and involved the necessity of its being detached and moved
back to its original position—a troublesome operation.