On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
11
Girders of less than 100 feet span are usually supported on
planed surfaces of metal which slide one upon the other. In
some cases pressures of over a ton. per square inch have been
imposed on. such surfaces with success, but usually the pressure is
much less. Larger bridges are as a rule supported on rollers and
it is desirable that these be of ample diameter and so placed as
not to be choked up with dirt or injured by moisture. Rollers 4
inches diameter are allowed | ton. load per inch length by good
American authorities, but this pressure is often exceeded in
English practice and apparently with impunity. Whether the
sliding plates or rollers should be surmounted by a rocking
arrangement is a point on which practice varies. In theory the
rocker is undoubtedly correct, giving a perfectly definite point
of support, and obviating the unequal pressure on the rollers
due to the slope of the deflected girder. Many excellent and
experienced authorities however omit it. The Great Hawkes-
bury Bridge, N.S.W., for example, has no rockers, though
carried out in the best possible style in. other respects. On the
other hand, the bridge over the Yarra, carrying the Port
Melbourne and St. Kilda Railways is carried everywhere on
rockers. The fact that in the former case the girders are very
deep and therefore stiff, while in the latter they are shallower,
may perhaps justify the difference.
It is often forgotten by bridge designers that expansion takes
place transversely as well as longitudinally, and that roller
systems should be arranged accordingly. One point of support
being fixed, all the others should be provided with rollers acting
in directions radiating from the fixed point.
Tall thin columns, such as those at Johnston Street Bridge,
previously referred to, do not need expansion arrangements as
a rule, the column itself being capable of springing an. inch or
two without injury. In dealing with the expansion arrange-
ments of existing structures, 1 would suggest that they be kept
clean and lubricated and protected from dust and moisture, and
that all impediment to free motion be removed.
We next have to consider the main girders constituting a large
and costly part of the structure. These are of various types,
including plate girders, box or tubular girders, closely latticed
girders of the type used 30 years ago, and the many modern