On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
26
We now proceed to cite cases of infraction of these rules, with
consequent loss of strength.
Figure 22 represents one girder of a small over bridge at the
Spencer Street Railway Station, Melbourne. It is 45 feet span
and about 4 feet deep. All the diagonal web members are of
3 x inch iron. These are suitable enough for tension purposes,
but most inefficient in compression, having a radius of gyration
across the plane of the girder of only -1 inch or about of the
length. This unfortunate girder further presents the faults of
redundancy, owing to the presence of unnecessary verticals, and
of absurdly heavy and complicated end pillars.
Fig. 23 represents an. amended design in which the more
heavily stressed compression diagonals are made of angle iron
having a radius of gyration, many times greater than that of the
flat bars, and in which the faults of redundancy and dispropor-
tionate ends are avoided.
Inch to the foot models in iron of each of these girders were
constructed at the University and tested to destruction, with the
following results:—1 he amended design, contained 16 per cent,
less iron than the original owing to the omission of the massive
end plates and intermediate verticals. It involved much less
workmanship owing to there being less than one-third the
number of rivets, and the time taken in making it was less than
half that of the other. Its actual breaking load distributed
along the bottom chord as in the actual bridge was 77libs,
as against 208 for the original structure. Thus with identical
external dimensions, and very little change in appearance,'the
cost of the structure was largely reduced, and its strength
increased nearly fourfold. The mode of fracture of this defective
design was, as was predicted by calculation, the buckling or side
ways bending of the weak compression diagonals near the end.
There would be no difficulty and but little expense in increasing
the strength of this structure threefold by simply clamping
angle irons to the most heavily stressed compression diagonals
so as to prevent their bending, and this ought to be done, and
was long ago urged by the writer, but without result.
lig. 24 represents the section of a large buttress or inclined
strut, erected at great cost on the down stream side of the
Victoria Street Bridge, near Melbourne, for the purpose of