On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
36
To carry out this method, diagrams of one of the simplest of
which Fig. 38 is a greatly reduced copy, have been made, and.
from them the following results have been obtained :—
The smallest secondary stress so far as he has gone, the writer
has found in the simple Warren girder, consisting of one series of
equilateral triangles.
In this girder, assuming that the transverse dimensions of the
chords and web members to be equal, and their sections symmet-
rical about the neutral axis, the secondary stress in the web
members is about four times that in the chords.
• Taking a Warren girder of 8 panels as shown in Fig. 38, of
100 feet span, with all members 1 foot wide, stressed to 6 tons
per square inch with ordinary provision for partial loading, and
a modulus of elasticity of 26,000,000, the secondary stress in the
chords was 8 per cent, of the primary, and in the web members
30 per cent, of the primary. Any reduction in the width of any
bar (as measured in the plane of the frame) without altering its
sectional area, reduces the secondary stress in the same propor-
tion. Hence it is desirable to keep the web members of such
girders as narrow as other considerations will permit.
The usual trough or T section employed for chords is subject
to only about half of the increase of stress, that a rectangular or
other section symmetrical above and below experiences. This is
due to the fact that the neutral axis lies so much closer to the
side where the primary and secondary stresses are additive.
Ihe N girder or that with alternate vertical and diagonal web
members is subject to considerably more secondary stress than
the Warren. of equal dimensions and width of bars, especially
in. the- vertical members. It also shows an intensification of
secondary stress at the midspan if made with an even number
of panels. At each of these points the secondary stress is at
least 50 per cent, greater than at the corresponding points of
the Warren, girder.
In the X girder, Fig. 23, the distribution of secondary stress
is peculiarly complicated. That in the chords is variable,
attaining maxima values at alternate panel points, and. vanishing,
or nearly so, at the other alternate panel points, its maximum
value being about double what it is on the corresponding Warren,
girder. That in. the diagonals is about equal to what exists in