On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
44
and European bridges of recent construction. If the
headway is insufficient to permit this overhead
bracing, then the top member must be kept straight
by some stiff construction continuous with the cross
girders, and extending from the ends of these
upwaid, and it is desirable that the cross girders bs
very deep and stiff. This is well arranged in the
Toolaraba Railway Bridge, Victoria, a section of
which is shown in Fig. 39, and in addition the
bottom chords must be kept from bending horizon-
tally by a stiff deck or complete horizontal system
of triangulation.
Very often the former of these requirements is met by
projecting the ends of the cross girders some distance outside the
main girders, and inserting an inclined strut from the end of the
cross girder to the top of the main girder. If this system be
used, these struts should be straight, of stiff section, capable of
bearing compression as well as tension, and making an angle of
about 30 deg. to the vertical.
Ihe costly and complex arched connections extending overhead
from one main girder to the other at the Footscray Railway
Bridge, near Melbourne, and on most of the earlier railway
bridges in New South Wales, are of very little value.
Existing bridges should be carefully examined, and if found
insufficiently braced, have proper triangulated systems added,
capable of bearing a wind pressure on the loaded structure of 20
lbs. per square foot, with a safety factor of at least 5, seeing the
wind may blow from either side, rendering the question one of
vibration strength.
Numerous errors occur in connection with the design and
arrangement of cross girders in many early road and railway
bridges, of these the following deserve notice :__
22. Cross girders not placed in proper relation to the web
system of main girders. —A most glaring instance is to be seen
in the bridge carrying the Heidelberg and Eltham Road across
the Plenty River, near Melbourne, shown in outline at Fig. 40.
Here the main girders are of the X type, and both triangulations
are equally strong. The cross girders, howevei’, are so placed
as to discharge their load immediately upon the alternate panel