Engineering Wonders of the World
Volume I
Forfatter: Archibald Williams
År: 1945
Serie: Engineering Wonders of the World
Forlag: Thomas Nelson and Sons
Sted: London, Edinburgh, Dublin and New York
Sider: 456
UDK: 600 eng - gl.
Volume I with 520 Illustrations, Maps and Diagrams
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
416 ENGINEERING WONDERS OF THE WORLD.
the destructive power of the 3-pounder Q.,
6-pounder Q., 12-pounder Q., and even the
4-inch weapon, as much overrated; and the
result of this discovery is seen in the influ-
ence it has had upon the recently-launched
warships of Germany, tho United States, and
Japan. In the war between Russia and
Japan the generally prevalent idea that a
couple of 12-pounder shells would disable a
destroyer or first-class torpedo boat, wherever
burst, was disproved on many occasions. The
most numerous engagements during the whole
naval campaign were between the torpedo
craft of the opposing nations, and the number
of hits these small vessels could sustain
without serious damage has been the subject
of much wonderment ever since.
Accepting this, the advent of such vessels
as the Tribal and Swift classes will necessitate
a return to secondary batteries in warships
before their prophesied abandonment has
fully taken effect. The Dreadnought carried
12-pounder Q. only ; the later ships have a
4-inch gun. The American Michigans carry
the 12-pounder Q.; the Delawares and Wyo-
mings will, as already stated, mount a 5-inch
weapon. So by all the Powers is the truth
being realized, and the 6-inch Q., or even
larger gun, will return, not, however, as
supporting the large guns of the main arma-
ment, but purely for defence against torpedo-
carrying craft.
Before closing this article, an instructive
word may perhaps be said as to the “ dis-
position ” of guns. So many people think
that the number of guns
The . carried by a warship is con-
Disposition troHed either by the length,
Armament. an(^’ therefore, “ room of side ”
displayed, or by the carrying
capacity of the ship herself. Actually, the
placing of the armament involves problems
of the utmost intricacy. Thus there is first
the mere length of the weapons to consider.
Take a 12-inch 50 calibre gun. It is about
52 feet from muzzle to breech, and. from
the breech to the barbette shield there is a
clearance of another 6 feet. Thus each pair
of 12-inch guns of the latest type requires a
“ swinging ” space of, at the least, 62 feet,
allowing a 3-foot passage behind the bar-
bette shield and a foot clearance between
the muzzle and the superstructure it
faces as it swings round. The next prob-
lem is that of “ blast ”—the vast disturbance
of the air around the muzzle created by the
discharge of a shot. So intense is this that
many a time decks have been severely rup-
tured. It is a fact both curious and not
generally known that the blast does not
cause a depression in the deck directly beneath
the muzzle, but it tends rather to raise a
“ bubble ” in it. Hence it is not support
that the decks require, but holding down
from below. The reason of this seeming
anomaly is simply explained : • the gases
composing the blast are at a super-terrific
heat, and in their passage utilize all the
combustible properties of the air, and form
a momentary yet powerful vacuum directly
above the deck. Where guns fire at all
angles across decks, steel “ flash-plates ” are
frequently sunk in t^e floor around a radius
corresponding to the training arc of the guns.
The last and governing difficulty, yet one
which is dovetailed in with the first two, is
the necessity for obtaining an all-round fire,
and, at the same time, the
... r Difficult
maximum concentration ot
Problems.
such, fire on the two broad-
sides. Here constructors are at once faced
by a hundred contending and hostile factors.
Superstructure there must be, to support the
boats, conning tower, fighting position, and
masts, funnels, etc., though the natural ten-
dency is to reduce all such “ top-hamper ”
to the minimum dictated by necessity. Then
the position of the magazines comes into
conflict with the other considerations. The
engines and boilers take up an immense