Efficiency Methods
An Introduction to Scientific Management
Forfatter: A.D. McKillop, M. McKillop
År: 1917
Forlag: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
Sted: London
Sider: 215
UDK: 658.01. mac kil. gl
With 6 Illustrations.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
REMUNERATION
137
kind claims a share of the extra profit from extra
output by the worker, it is a claim that can be
substantiated, even if the proportion in which the
profit is shared has still to be discussed. All
leaders of the efficiency movement lay the greatest
stress on its being, primarily, the business of the
management to get work done well and done
quickly, and not to leave either quality or quantity
to the individual exertions of each worker, according
to his lights.
We must now describe in detail the three best
known methods of remuneration, as used by three
of the leaders.1
Dr. Taylor’s differential piece-rate is known to the
Link Bélt workers as “ the two piece-rate ” system.
A certain number of pieces per hour or per day is
fixed as the standard. For the whole number of
pieces, if above the standard, the worker is paid at
a certain rate ; if his number is below the standard
he is paid for all at a different, lower, rate. A
simple example is given by Dr. laylor of men who
were paid 35c. per “ piece ” when they made 10 or
more than 10 in a day; and only 25c. per piece
when they made less than 10. The simplicity of
this method seems its only attraction, as there
appears a great injustice if one compares the treat-
1 A very complete and clear account of them is given in R. F. ,
Hoxie’s " Scientific Management and Labour,” pp. 65-75-
Schloss refers to Taylor’s piece-rate system in a perfunctory
and misleading way on p. 91 (edition 1898), mentioning only the
cut in rate, for not completing the specified amount. But
“ Shop Management ” had not been published, and very little
was known about J ay lor s work.