Efficiency Methods
An Introduction to Scientific Management
Forfatter: A.D. McKillop, M. McKillop
År: 1917
Forlag: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
Sted: London
Sider: 215
UDK: 658.01. mac kil. gl
With 6 Illustrations.
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
TRADES UNIONS
185
good deal of investigation is going on. It is one of
the most pressing problems in fatigue-study ; it 3s
vitally important in considering output of munitions.
Everybody is becoming persuaded that science will
be able to make some pronouncement on the subject
shortly.
Meanwhile the majority of people still assume
that work done bears the usual simple proportion
relation to hours worked, i.e., that one does in a
factory in twelve hours half as much again as in
eight hours; and if one puts in two hours’ overtime
after that, another quarter of the eight hours’
output will be added. And nearly a century ago
Robert Owen had proved that the rule of simple
proportion did not hold with regard to output and
hours !
The American efficiency leaders have taken their
stand on the assertion that facts established by
scientific investigation cannot form the subject of
bargaining. It is a reasonable hope that the
optimum number of hours for each kind of labour,
for regular permanent work, will before long be in
this position. This optimum may not be eight
hours; it may be a little more or less.1
Of course, if workpeople are being paid any sort
of bonus for extra work, on a system which is some
sort of piece-rate, they may themselves desire to
work longer hours than the optimum, to gain more
1 Sir William Lever, in a recent article in the Daily Chronicle
(Christmas, 1916), was disposed on general social grounds to
suggest six hours.