ForsideBøgerA Treatise On The Princip… Of Harbour Engineering

A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Harbour Engineering

Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham

År: 1908

Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company

Sted: London

Sider: 410

UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 134.16

With18 Plates And 220 Illustrations In The Text

Søgning i bogen

Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.

Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.

Download PDF

Digitaliseret bog

Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.

Side af 416 Forrige Næste
122 HARBOUR ENGINEERING. Accordingly, if it be possible to determine the velocity of impact, the pressure momentarily exerted may be deduced from the above relationship. Now, the velocity of a wave in shallow water has been found to be nearly the same as that which would be acquired by a heavy body falling freely from rest under the influence of gravitation through a height equal to the semi-depth of the water plus three-fourths of the height of the wave. In symbols, When the depth of water exceeds the length of the wave, the speed of the latter is practically independent of the depth, and is almost exactly equal to the velocity acquired by a body falling freely through a height equal to one- half the radius of the circle, the circumference of which constitutes the length of the wave. That is: — Reverting to the first, (a), of the foregoing equations, we may recall the fact that if the velocity of a falling body be expressed in terms of the height (Ä), or perhaps, more correctly, the depth below the position of rest, we have v2 = 2gh; and, substituting this value for V2 in (a), p= 2wh ..... (8) which leads us to the conclusion that the pressure intensity of a water-jet is equal to the weight of a column of water twice as high as the amount of free fall required to generate the specified velocity in a heavy particle. We see, however, that the numerical coefficient in this last expression is not applicable to wave pressures, owing to the modifications in the value of v given above in (/I) and (y). As a matter of fact, the value of the coefficient is very variously stated by different aùthorities, so that all that is justifiable is to write in general terms, p= kwh ..... (e) where k has a fairly wide range of values. Thus, Dubuat gives £=1’85 Rayleigh „ Æ=1‘96 Mariotte ,, Zc=l'25 Gaillard ,, £=1'31 Jæssel ,, 4=162 Thibault ,, Zr=l'85, the average value being 1’6. It is to be noted, however, that Gaillard considers the velocity of the crest of the wave, while breaking, to exceed the velocity of the body of the