Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
BREAKWATER DESIGN. I 43
just under Is. 9d. per lineal yard per annum. The remaining and later
portion of the breakwater costs practically nothing for upkeep.
Apart from the parapet wall and the quay, the cost of the breakwater
is stated by Baron Quinette de Rochemont1 to have been as follows,
according to the depths of water in which it was founded :—
In depths of 33 feet, £39, 13s. per foot run.
„ 65 „ 71, 16s.
„ 100 „ 118, 4s.
According to M. de Joly,2 however, the cost of the original breakwater,
including the parapet and quay wall in a depth of 60 feet, was £127 per
linear foot, a figure which is evidently somewhat in excess of those quoted
above, even when allowance is made for the additional work covered. M. de
Joly’s cost for the extension, however, is in accordance with Baron de
Rochemont’s figure for the same depth, viz.: 100 feet.
t( 10 90 30 W 50 60 7Ç 8p 90 Kp 9^0
Scale of Feel:.
Fro. 118. —Digue de la Joliette, Marseilles.
A. Rubble deposited after construction of quay wall.
B. Stones from 2 to 25 cwts. a-piece.
C. Blocks above 25 ,,
Of its class, the Grande Jetée is an efficient example. Only one objection
can be laid agaiust the design, and that is the narrowness of the uppermost
outer slope flanking the masonry apron. The existing width of 27 feet seems
to be insufficient to prevent the protection blocks from being occasionally
rolled off by the waves into deep water.
Settlements in the mass of the breakwater, though they have been by no
means inconsiderable in themselves, appear not to have given rise to any
serious dislocation of the parapet wall. Indeed, it is said that it is only
possible to observe, on serutiny, a few vertical cracks here and there, with
widths of mere fractions of an inch. The shelter wall and its apron are not
bonded together : they are simply in contiguity. Separation was inevitable,
since they rest upon distinctly different foundations, the wall upon material
of smaller size and greater compactness than the apron.
The Joliette Digue (fig. 118), constructed in about 38 feet of water, follows
1 Cours de Travaux Maritimes, lère Partie, 1896.
2 Report on French Breakwaters to Teuth Int. Nav. Cong., Milan, 1905.