ForsideBøgerA Treatise On The Princip… Of Harbour Engineering

A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Harbour Engineering

Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham

År: 1908

Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company

Sted: London

Sider: 410

UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 134.16

With18 Plates And 220 Illustrations In The Text

Søgning i bogen

Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.

Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.

Download PDF

Digitaliseret bog

Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.

Side af 416 Forrige Næste
12 HARBOUR ENGINEERING a slightly different classification based on the object to be attained. From this standpoint there are three important divisions, as follows : — (1) Harbours of Refuge. (2) Commercial Harbours. (3) Fishery Harbours. Though fundamentally in unison, and oftentimes found in combination the designs of these three classes are sufficiently distinct to justify us in Scale of Feet: Fig. 6. —Peterhead Harbour of Refuge. treating them separately, describing their particular functions and enumerating their special requirements. Harbours of Refuge. —The principal duty of a Harbour of Refuge is, as the name implies, to provide a refuge for vessels overtaken by sudden stress of weather, or otherwise hard pressed or disabled. The proper loccde for the construction of such harbours is obviously at conveniently accessible stations upon coasts which are inhospitable and dangerous. Yet, manifest as is the desideratum, the means of its accomplishment is not so obvious, and the subject has given rise to some conflict of opinion. Is the proper position for a harbour of refuge upon an outstanding frontage or within a bay? Ought it to be projected into the open, or recessed within the coast-line? In the former case, the goal is more easily reached and less delay is incurred in putting out again to sea; on the other hand, there is greater exposure, and this endangers the ingress of vessels, rendering them more liable to miss the entrance, in which case they will probably be driven on to the shore. Yet the risk of ultimate catastrophe must necessarily be greater in the case of a