Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
HARBOUR DESIGN
23
being aided therein by the littoral current. The heavier particles are rolled
along and partake of a zig-zag movement, as shown in fig. 14. It is generally
agreed that the action is practically confined to the region between high and
low water marks.
The trend of littoral drift is therefore attributable, in the first instance,
to the wind which governs the pré-
dominant direction of the waves.
To illustrate in some way, however
imperfectly, the general effect of wind
and flow upon a coast-line, with the
modifications brought about by intru-
sive structures, figs. 15-22 have been
Fig. 14. —Track of Shore Drift.
prepared. A simple case only has been taken ; the action, as can well
be imagined, is often much more complex. The supposition made is that
of a coast-line with the dominant current flowing parallel thereto (from
right to left) coincident with the direction of the prevailing wind. Fig. 15
and those which
servi
Fig. 15.
the tendency towards shoaling in
various parts, which is brought about
by the construction of harbour
works of typical kinds.
The straight pier or breakwater
at right angles to the coast-line
(fig. 15) induces an accretion of sand
and shingle along each of its sides.
The windward accumulation is the
more pronounced, the leeward deposit being reduced by eddying round the
outer end of the pier. The returned pier (fig. 16) serves to increase the
leeward deposit, there being a circular motion of the water round the pier-
head with a tendency to scour at that point, while the slacker water inside
leads to settlement of suspended material. An example of this is to be
found in the harbour of Salina
Cruz on the Pacific Coast (fig. 18),
where the initiation of a break-
water of this type brought the
low-water line forward, tempo-
rarily, at anyrate, to the 26 feet
contour of six years previously.
Much the same effect is apparent
with double piers (fig. 17), the accretion being emphasised by reason of the
additional extent of quiescent area. Evidence in support of this is forth-
coming from Madras, where the harbour entrance is slowly but surely silting
up in this way. Apparently the only practicable means of remedying the evil
due to solid structures is that of substituting openwork for the portion of the
jetty which immediately joins the land. It has even been suggested that the
most logical method is that of “ Island Harbours,” formed in deep water out