The Works Of Messrs. Schneider And Co.
Forfatter: James Dredge
År: 1900
Forlag: Printed at the Bedford Press
Sted: London
Sider: 747
UDK: St.f. 061.5(44)Sch
Partly Reproduced From "Engineering"
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
DE REFFYE FIELD GUN AND MITRAILLEUSE.
163
When the permanent peace of 1815 succeecled the long
period of war, the manufacture of ordnance ceased entirely
at Creusot, and with it, as we have seen, the active life
of the establishment, which having been for so long wliolly
devoted to the production of war material, had lost all
its industrial connection. Fifty-five years later, in 1870,
the manufacture of guns was resumed at Creusot, but only
as a brandi of its general industry. Düring the war of
1870, Messrs. Schneider and Co. were called upon by the
Government of National Defence to undertake the supply
of artillery to the French army ; they responded to the
rèquest. so promptly that, altliough they had to instal a
special plant for the purpose, they were able to deliver,
in five months, 23 batteries of “ 7 ’’ bronze guns, on the
De Reffye system ; two batteries of steel guns of the same
calibre, and on the same system; 16 batteries of De Reffye
machine guns ; in all 250 pieces of ordnance. These were
delivered in the time mentioned, together witli the necessary
carriages, gun-limbers, ammunition wagons, &c., making
370 pièces in all.
Illustrations are given in Figs. 554 and 555 of two
De Reffye guns, one being a bronze “ 7 ” field gun, and
the other a mitrailleuse. These fiele! guns fired elongated
shot, fitted with a lead covering ; the Cartridge was charged
with compresse«! pebble powder, and was provided with
a metallic base to prevent the escape of gas. The guns
were first mounted on wood-bracketed carriages, and
afterwards on the type of iron carriage shown in Fig. 555.
The following are some of the leading dimensions of these
guns :
Total length of gun ..
Weight...
Diameter of bore
Weight of projectile ..
Muzzle velocity
1.012 m.
650 kilos.
.085 m.
7.100 kilos.
390 m.
39.842 in.
13 cwt.
3.346 in.
15.650 1b.
1280 ft.
The euns, whether ôf bronze or steel, were cast in one
piece, and had the same shape, except that the chase in
the former was swelled out, as shown in Fig. 555, while
in the latter it was formed like a truncated cone. The
breecli end of the gun was fitted with a bracket for housing
the breech-piece carrying frame ; the powder chamber was
made slightly conical, and a taper connected the chamber
with the bore. The rifling was right handed, and of a
constant pitch with 14 grooves. The breech mechanism
consistée! of a breech-piece with an interrupted screw ;
it was mounted on a hinged frame, and was operated by
a handle and crank. The movement of the breech-block
was guided by three bars bolted to tlie frame, and on which
it moved to and fro in grooves. A sliding-bolt joined the
frame to the gun and to the breech-piece. The front of
the breech-block was made hollow, and was notched in
such a männer that it engaged the base of the cartridge
and facilitated the removal of the latter when the breech
was thrown open. The charge was fired through a vent
in the breech-piece, drilled obliquely through to the centre
line of the bore.
The De Reffye mitrailleuse, Fig. 554, was made for
firing 25 small-arm Cartridges ; these were discharged
consécutively, and there was no recoil of the gun. The
following are some partieulars of this machine gun :
Total length of gun 1.425 m. 52.102 in.
Number of barrels 25 25
Diameter of bore .0128 m. .603 in.
Weight of each shot ... 50 grammes 1.71 oz.
,, limber loaded Total weight of gun and limber fully 604 kgs. 1328 1b.
equipped 1405 kgs. 3367 1b.
Weight of gun and carriage complété 536 kgs. 1180 1b.
Maximum range 3400 m. 11,000 ft.
The gun was made up of 25 breechloading rifled barrels,
grouped inside a bronze casing; the cartridge cases were
made of cardboard with a metallic base ; they contained a
lead bullet and the charge of compressée! pebble powder.
The varions parts of the firing mechanism were fastened
inside tonguecl clamps and were joined by pins. The
movable breech-block contained the Cartridges, and the
block always went into place perfeetly centred by travel-
ling in grooves made in the rear of the breech. The
charges were fired in succession by percussion. This
successive firing was insured by means of a supplementary
breech-block carrying the 25 firing locks and disengaging
plate. When the whole series of charges had been fired,
tlie firing plate was removed by traversing a screw, the
movable breech was taken away, and was replaced by
another that had been loaded in the meantime. The gun
was mounted on trunnions on its carriage, and was fitted
with a lateral training mechanism. The elevating gear
was a screw and wheel at the rear of tlie trunnions, and on
the carriage was placed a device for charging the breech-
block with the 25 cartridges. The gun and carriage were
placed in position by a lever fitted to the trail-block, and
the gun coukl be accurately trained by means of a hand-
wheel and screw that causée! the piece to turn on its
vertical support. Three sights were provided—a central
and two lateral sights. It is almost unnecessary to say
that both these types of guns are now obsolete, and they
have been reproduced only to illustrate the gun work
executed by Messrs. Schneider and Co. at a time prior
to the tliorough equipment of their works for the con-
struction of war material.
For some time prior to 1870, discussion had been active>
both in France and in England, as to the best material to
be used in the construction of guns of ail calibres. Perhaps
in England the dispute had been more energetic than
elsewhere; it was identified on the one hana with Arm-
strong, and on the other, to a large extent with Bessemer,
the former being the advocate of iron, and the latter of
steel. The exceptional advantages possessed by Armstrong
inclined the weight of opinion towards iron as the most
suitable material, and no doubt the conclusion influencée!
foreign Governments.
In France, steel was regarded with mistrust until the
French Government requested Messrs. Schneider and Co.
to carry ont some experiments with the object of ascertain-
ing how far steel, as a material for gun construction