The Madsen Machine Gun
År: 1918
Sider: 32
UDK: 623
This copy reprinted in Copenhagen by Jensen & Rønager
Reprinted in 1920
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
25
The Madsen
[6 June 1918]
Gun. 26
1,000 Madsen guns with the new factory,
I think the exchange is at the least in
our favour. In six months you could not
make those 1,000 civilians into soldiers;
at any rate into only a very inferior ar-
ticle, in my opinion: and if you could
turn on those civilians to making 1,000
Madsen guns you would arm a good many
of our present Divisions in a way in
which they are certainly not armed at
the present time, and with a weapon which
I am convinced, if we had had it only in
small numbers at the beginning of the
war, would have put an entirely different
complexion on the whole thing.
Lord SALTOUN: My Lords, I hardly
like to intervene, but I am a very old
soldier, I am sorry to say. There are one
or two things, however, that fell from
the noble Lord who answered the
Questions which seem to me to require
something more explicit. I do not think
that he understood the matter. He did
not give much hope that the gun would
be accepted; yet there is no doubt that
this Madsen gun is the best quick-firing
gun. Surely it is the duty of the Govern-
ment to equip the men in the field with
the best possible weapon and not to be
affected by any expence or trouble to
which it may put the country. There was
one other thing to which the noble Lord
drew attention, and that was the draw-
back of having different weapons with
different ammunition, but this weapon
uses the same ammunition as the Lewis
gun, and the result would be that you
would only be adding another weapon.
You would do that gradually and so
strengthen the arms we have, and not in
any way reduce them.
Earl BRASSEY: My Lords, I have had
the privilege, like my noble and gallant
friend who moved this Resolution, of
seeing this gun. I cannot pretend to be
a machine-gun expert, but I commanded
a Yeomanry regiment for some years be-
fore the war and have done so for two
and a-half years since the war, and I
share the opinion of the noble Lord that
this gun is infinitely superior for certain
purposes to any other machine-gun. In
my opinion it will be a national disaster
if it is not at once adopted by this coun-
try. If it goes to our enemies the conse-
quences will follow to which Lord Beres-
ford alluded.
The Duke of SOMERSET: My Lords,
I merely rise to back the opinion of my
noble friend Lord Beresford. I had an
opportunity of seing this gun thoroughly
explained yesterday, and I also saw the
Lewis gun, and I think nobody can see
the two without noticing at once the
extraordinary improvement which the Mad-
sen gun is on the Lewis g,un. I will quote
what a New Zealand officer said to me.
When I remarked yesterday, »How any-
body can be so mad as not to take up
this gun when they can get it instead of
the Lewis gun, I cannot .understand,« he
replied »ALI I can say is that it amounts
to a crime, not to a mistake.«
Lord PENRHYN: My Lords, there was
one point with regard to what Lord El-
phinstone said to which I should rather
like to take exception, and that was as
to the weight of the spare barrel, which
I think we were told was 5 lbs. We have
always to remember that although the
spare barrel of the Madsen gun may weigh
5 lbs. it takes only fifteen seconds to
replace the heated barrel by the cool spare
barrel, whereas the Lewis gun is for at
least twenty minutes out of action, which
makes a very great difference. There is also
a point which I do not think has had
quite sufficient stress laid upon it, and
it is this. I am informed that the Ger-
mans know perfectly well when our Lewis
guns are out of action, and that their
rushes in waves are to a very considerable
extent timed to meet the occasions when
our Lewis guns happen to be out of action.
With the Madsen gun you could change
the barrel in fifteen seconds and go
straight away.
Lord HENEAGE: My Lords, there is
one point that has not been answered,
and that is as to the danger of the enemy
getting this gun whilst the War Office
are considering whether or not they will
have it, because it is of very little use the
War Office coming to the conclusion six
months hence that this is the best gun
which can be had if in the meantime the