The Madsen Machine Gun
År: 1918
Sider: 32
UDK: 623
This copy reprinted in Copenhagen by Jensen & Rønager
Reprinted in 1920
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
27
The Madseu
[LORDS]
Gun.
28
Germans have got it by thousands in the
field.
-
The Earl of ALBEMARLE: My Lords;
I should like to mention one matter which
was not referred to by my noble and gal-
lant friend. Yesterday I saw a demonstra-
tion of this gun with Cavalry, and' the
demonstration ended with a competition
between the Hotchkiss gun and the Mad-
sen gun mounted on Cavalry horses. At a
given signal the guns commenced to be
brought into action. From the time the
signal was given I noticed that the Mad-
sen gun got into action in fifteen seconds.
The Hotchkiss gun and its personnel
and equipment were not dismounted and
had not begun to fire—I think I am quite
correct in saying—until the Madsen gun
had fired something like 100 rounds. I
think it was more, but I am certain that
it was 100 rounds before the Hotchkiss
gun commenced to fire. This proves the
celerity with which this gun can be
brought into action.
Lord BERESFORD: My Lords, I must
say I agree with my noble friend Lord
Salisbury that when Lord Elphinstone
began his speech I thought we were going
to have the old stereotyped form of Go-
vernment reply which is so heartbreaking
to those who want reforms. At the end
of his speech, however, he was certainly
more encouraging. I do not want to divide
the House, and if my noble friend Lord
Elphinstone will assure me that the
authorities who dictate as to whether this
gun is to be issued to the Army or not
will go and see a trial—such trials as I
have seen—and if he will assure me that
a gun of the latest pattern will be sent
to Headquarters in France to get a real
opinion, then I will not divide the House.
Otherwise I shall do so. Those are two
questions to which I want a definite reply.
I also want an answer to the point
raised by Lord Heneage, as to what is
going to happen to us if the enemy get
this new gun, because I am informed that
they are after it. They have got the old
pattern. Therefore I say let us get the
gun somehow or other, even if we are not
going to use it. There are one or two
other questions. The noble Lord said there
had been no adverse criticism of the Le-
The Earl of Albemarle.
wis gun. I think he is making a mistake.
There have been many adverse criticisms
on its continual jamming, arid letters have
been written by men who worked the gun
pointing out certain improvements which
they think should be made to stop the
jamming which is so fatal. Lord Penrhyn
is quite right when he says that the Ger-
mans know about the jamming and
heating, and so time their attacks. Then
Lord Stair pointed out about the training.
Lord Elphinstone said that training would
be difficult, but with this gun training
would be nothing. Training in taking to
pieces and assembling’ a Lewis gun takes
days and days, but men can learn this
gun in a few ho,urs/ They can learn to
take to pieces and assemble the Madsen
gun in a few hours.
Then my noble friend spoke about a
year—»it may be a year.« Suppose it does
take a year! But it will not take any-
thing like a year if the thing is fairly
tackled and certain industrials are used
at once. Does he suppose the war is going
to be over in a year? How do we know
when the war is going to be over? This
war cannot be over until the American
nation comes in effective force with
2,000,000 or 3,000,000 men in the trenches,
and they cannot be there until October of
next year. That is my opinion. I hope I
am wrong. At any rate, we do not know
when the war is going to be over, and we
must give our men the best weapon as
soon as ever we can in ordei’ to end the
war.
I agree with the military authorities
that to increase the types of weapon is a
very serious thing, but it is not so serious
when they all use the same ammunition.
The difficulty about increasing types of
weapons in my early days was that it
always meant new ammunition, and that
is a most difficult question. Of course
nobody in this House, least of all an old
Service man, wants to dictate to the mi-
litary authorities. The military authorities
must be the judges. They must be the
people who decide. All I ask is that the
military authorities should go and see the
gun tried. Not one of them has seen it
tried. As I said, they have seen it’in a
room. That is like seeing the model of a
ship in a room. If you want to know any-
thing about the ship you must go to the