Brake Tests
År: 1913
Forlag: Pensylvania Railroad Company
Sted: Altoona, Penna.
Sider: 401
A Report Of A Series Of Road Tests Of Brakes On Passanger Equipment Cars Made At Absecon, New Jersey, In 1913
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
139
300. The tender of the second locomotive No. 5223—K2Ba, was
equipped with a truck of the arch bar type, later replaced by one of
the pedestal type, thereby increasing the weight from 74,600 to 82,450
pounds. In order to produce the standard braking power for this
weight, the 12-inch cylinder which was on the tender required a total
lever ratio of 14.6 to 1, which is considerably higher than is desirable
for a single shoe rigging. The high lever ratio combined with a relatively
large horizontal shoe movement resulted in excessive piston travel.
301. By replacing the 12-inch cylinder, which is standard for K2.
tenders, with a 14-inch, the total lever ratio was reduced from 14.6 to 1
to 10.7 to 1, and by comparing the stop of the locomotive in breakaway
tests before and after the application of the 14-inch cylinder (test 31),
the increased effectiveness of the brake with lower lever ratio is apparent.
302. Diagramatic drawings of the locomotive and tender brake
rigging are shown in Figs. 82 and 83, and the percentage of braking
power for 50 pounds brake cylinder pressure is shown on page 321.
Brake Rigging Requirements.
303. These tests have developed certain principles, most of which
were known before the test, but their relative importance was not
established until a satisfactory design of clasp brake had been developed
and stops obtained, which were anticipated from the application of
two brake shoes per wheel. The complete design of any brake rigging
must be a compromise in which the relative values of each of the items
herein enumerated have been given their proper consideration with
respect to each other.
(A) Precaution against accidents that may result from parts of the
rigging dropping on the track.
(B) Maximum efficiency of brake rigging at all times to insure the
desired stop with a minimum nominal per cent, of braking
power, thereby reducing to a minimum the cost and weight
of brake rigging and air brake equipment.
(C) Uniform distribution of brake force, in relation to weight
braked, on all wheels, to insure the use of maximum retar-
dation with minimum chances for wheel sliding.
(D) With a given nominal per cent, braking power, the actual
braking (which depends on the brake rigging efficiency) to
remain constant throughout the life of shoes and wheels.
(E) Piston travel to be as near constant as practicable under all
conditions of cylinder pressure, to insure maximum stopping
efficiency for emergency braking and desired flexibility for
service braking at low speed.
(F) Minimum brake shoe wear in doing a given amount of work
in a minimum time.