Brake Tests
År: 1913
Forlag: Pensylvania Railroad Company
Sted: Altoona, Penna.
Sider: 401
A Report Of A Series Of Road Tests Of Brakes On Passanger Equipment Cars Made At Absecon, New Jersey, In 1913
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
288
referred to, it will be noted that the efficiency of the rigging at 150 per
cent, braking power is 83.2 per cent, which means that the actual brak-
ing power at the shoe will be
150 X 0.823 = 123.45 per cent.
Referring to Fig. 170, it will be seen that at 123.45 per cent,
braking power the curve representing the results of machine tests
of slotted flanged shoes gives a value of 603 feet as the stopping
distance. Now applying the ratio or difference factor 1.265 (Par. 552)
the actual stop of the car will be 603 X1.265 =763 feet at the actual
braking power of 123.45 per cent, or at a nominal braking power of
150 per cent.
554. It must be borne in mind that in the example given above
the brake application on the road is assumed to be an electro-pneu-
matic emergency which requires an average time from point of trip
to maximum cylinder pressure of about 2.25 seconds. The time to point
of equivalent instantaneous application of brake is 0.75 second. The
ratio given for the machine test results is for this same time of applica-
tion. If it is desired to use this factor for any other brake application
with a different time to point of equivalent instantaneous application,
then the difference in time must be multiplied by the initial speed in feet
per second of the car and this difference added to or subtracted from
the distance (763 feet mentioned above) depending upon whether the
time is greater or less.
CONCLUSIONS.
AIR BRAKE.
1. The introduction into service of cars with UC equipment will
result in an improvement in the handling of trains (Par. 201) and is
advisable for the following reasons:
(a) In service applications a greater flexibility is provided by
the UC equipment than by the PM equipment. (Pars.
121 and 122.)
(b) Because of the respective sizes of reservoirs used a greater
reduction of brake pipe pressure to obtain the same
braking power is required with the UC equipment than
with the PM equipment. A longer time is available in
which the engineman can judge the rate of retardation and
thus has better control of the speed of the train. (Par. 123.)
(c) In release the UC equipment is more sensitive and more
prompt than the PM equipment. (Par. 227.)
(d) The presence of UC equipment mixed with the PM equip-
ment in the same train results in an improvement in the
release action of all the brakes. (Par. 237.)