Some Engineering Problems Of The Panama Canal In Their Relation To Geology And Topography
Forfatter: Donald F. MacDonald
År: 1915
Forlag: Washington Government printing Office
Sted: Washington
Sider: 88
UDK: 626.1
Published With The Approval Of The Govenor Of The Panama Canal
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
GENERAL GEOLOGY OF CANAL ZONE. 31
STABILITY OF THE ISTHMUS.
A brief reconnaissance of the geology of western Panama was made
possible by a cooperative arrangement between the Isthmian Canal
Commission, the Smithsonian Institution, and the United States
Geological Survey. The information thus gathered, coupled with
that obtained from a study of the Canal Zone geology, leads to the
conclusion that the isthmian land first appeared as an archipelago of
islands in a shallow sea. During the Oligocène period, when the Cu-
curacha formation was laid down, there seems to have been established,
possibly for the first time, a land connection between the two conti-
nents. At least there is, as yet, no positive geologic evidence of an
earlier connection. Before the close of the Oligocène, the sea again
swept over the submerged land, leaving only a few islands above the
surface of the water. It appears that the Miocene began with an
emergence, and that until its close the isthmian barrier once more
effectively separated the oceans. With, the beginning of Pliocene
time, the land again sank until only the highest points were left
above the surface of the sea. Another uprise ushered in the Pleis-
tocene, and before this period was well advanced the land stood
several hundred feet higher than now. Again sinking began, and
continued until the land was 6 to 30 feet below present sea level.
The last uprise, according to the fresh appearance of the old raised
sea beaches and other evidence, must have taken place within very-
recent time, probably within the last thousand years.
In all, there is a clear record of four oscillations and the beginning
of another elevation. Hence the question: Is the canal in danger from
this uprise? Should the emergence bo rapid, of course it would be
in some danger; but the fact is, that the average rate oi uplift for say,
the last 1,000 years has been something less than 0.03 foot a year, or
less than 3 feet in 100 years. Dredging could, of course, take care
of this rise with little additional expense above the ordinary dredging
necessary for tho annual upkeep of the canal. Then, too, there is
always tho chance that this motion will stop entirely, and a sinking
begin. Arguing then from what has happened in recent geologic
time, it may bo concluded that the canal is not in any appreciable
danger from the geologic instability of the isthmian land.
It is believed that the sinking of tho ocean bottom outside the rela-
tively shallow depths of the isthmian shore waters has been the
chief cause of tho earthquake periods that have, so far as the record
go, visited the isthmus every 30 to 35 years, and that each of these
seismic disturbances has resulted in some increased uprise of the
land mass. This matter is more fully discussod under the subject of
“Earthquakes.”