Armour & Weapons
Forfatter: Charles Ffoulkes
År: 1909
Forlag: At The Clarendon Press
Sted: Oxford
Sider: 112
UDK: 623 Ffou
With A Preface By Viscount Dillon, V.P.S.A. Curator Of The Tower Armouries
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
CHAP. VI
THE DECADENCE
so
in late seventeenth-century armour, where a single plate is
embossed to represent several overlapping plates or lames, and also
in the plentiful use of ‘ clous perdus ’ or false rivets which are
scattered broadcast on some suits in places where no rivets are
needed.
To turn from the degradation of the simplicity and constructional
perfection of armour to the reasons which led to its gradual disuse,
we find that, after the Gothic period, armour became heavier,
partly because of the shock tactics in vogue on active service and
partly because, in the case of jousting armour, strength and great
weight were needed to protect the wearer from vital injury, and
partly because the improvement of firearms necessitated extra
defence. The temper of the metal used was such that it would
resist a pistol shot, as we have noticed in Chapter III ; and on
examining the surface of the metal we find, as in the Pembridge
helm, that it is of so fine a texture that a modern knife will not
leave a scratch when testing it. Therefore we must regard the
weight of armour as one of the chief reasons for its disuse. Again,
military tactics necessitated forced marches and longer expeditions
than before ; or at any rate it was discovered that when
engaging in long expeditions the troops were chafed and hindered
by their armour. It is somewhat curious to note that as the leg
was the first part of the body to be armed with plate, so the leg
armour was the first to be discarded. The jambs were the first
pieces to go, and were replaced, in the case of the mounted man,
by thick buff leather boots. The tassets were prolonged to the
knee or—to describe this portion of the armour in a different way—
the cuisses themselves were formed of riveted lames and the
tassets discarded.
The helmet at the latter end of the seventeenth century is
generally open and of the burgonet type. The breastplate
is usually short and projects downwards at the lower portion
after the fashion of the ‘ peascod ’ doublet of civilian wear. As
early as 1586, at the siege of Zutphen, we find officers discarding
their armour and keeping only the cuirass. From the Hatfield MSS.
FFOULKES G