Armour & Weapons
Forfatter: Charles Ffoulkes
År: 1909
Forlag: At The Clarendon Press
Sted: Oxford
Sider: 112
UDK: 623 Ffou
With A Preface By Viscount Dillon, V.P.S.A. Curator Of The Tower Armouries
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
H
K)
INTRODUCTION
in armour may be considered perhaps rather sentimental and
romantic than practical or useful. But, if we consider the history
of the Art of War, we shall find that our subject will materially
assist us, when we remember that the growth of nations and their
fortunes, at any rate till recent times, have depended to a large
extent on the sword and the strength of the arm that wielded it.
There is another aspect of historical study which is of some
importance, especially to those who stand on the outskirts of
the subject. This aspect one may call the ‘ realistic view The
late Professors York Powell and J. R. Green both insisted on
the importance of this side of the subject ; and we cannot but
feel that to be able to visualize the characters of history and to
endow them with personal attributes and personal equipment
must give additional interest to the printed page and other docu-
mentary evidences. When the study of defensive armour has
been carefully followed wc shall find that the Black Prince appears
to us not merely as a name and a landmark on the long road of
time ; we shall be able to picture him to ourselves as a living
individual dressed in a distinctive fashion and limited in his
actions, to some extent, by that very dress and equipment. The
cut of a surcoat, the hilt of a sword, the lines of a breastplate, will
tell us, with some degree of accuracy, when a man lived and to
what nation he belonged ; and, at the same time, in the later
years, we shall find that the suit of plate not only proclaims the
individuality of the wearer, but also bears the signature and
individuality of the maker ; a combination of interests which
few works of handicraft can offer us.
From the eleventh to the end of the fourteenth century we
have but a few scattered examples of actual defensive armour and
arms ; and the authenticity of many of these is open to doubt.
The reason for this scarcity is twofold. Firstly, because the
material, in spite of its strength, is liable to destruction by rust
and corrosion, especially when the armour is of the interlinked
chain type which exposes a maximum surface to the atmosphere.
A second reason, of equal if not greater importance, is the fact