Armour & Weapons
Forfatter: Charles Ffoulkes
År: 1909
Forlag: At The Clarendon Press
Sted: Oxford
Sider: 112
UDK: 623 Ffou
With A Preface By Viscount Dillon, V.P.S.A. Curator Of The Tower Armouries
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
CHAP. II
THE TRANSITION PERIOD
39
In the next example (Plate III, 5) we find the mail still worn on
the legs and arms, but on the latter the vambrace and the coude
plate seem to be hinged in the manner adopted during the period
of full armour. The upper part of the leg is protected by studded
pourpointerie, which was frequently employed as being of more
convenience on horseback. These thigh defences were called the
Cuisses. The Bascinet is shown and also the short surcoat or Jupon.
The brass of an unknown knight (Plate III, 6) is typical of
what has come to be known as the ‘ Camail ’ period. The arm-
and leg-pieces completely enclose the limb and are fastened
with hinges and straps as in the later periods. The gauntlets
show the Gadlings, or knuckle-knobs, which are a marked feature
of this period, and the whole suit is richly decorated with engraved
borders. Some writers divide the Transition Period of armour
into ‘ Surcoat ‘ Cyclas’, ‘ Jupon’, and ‘Tabard’. This, however,
seems unnecessary if we are considering only the development of
defensive armour, and not the whole question of costume. The
camail is so marked a detail of the knightly equipment that it may
reasonably be used to describe the fashion in armour from about
1360 to 1405. In this example the figure is clad in complete plate,
though the hauberk is worn beneath, as may be seen at the lower
edge of the jupon and also in the ‘ vif de I’harnois or portion of
the body at the armpit, which was unprotected by plate. In some
instances this vital spot was protected by a circular, oval, crescent-
shaped, or square plate attached by laces, which modern writers
call the Rondel, but which Viscount Dillon, in a most interesting
article, proves to have been the Moton or Besague 1 (Fig. 15).
The effigy of the Black Prince at Canterbury is a good example
of the armour of this period, but it is interesting to note that, while
the monumental brasses frequently give such details as straps,
buckles, &c., this effigy shows no constructional detail whatever.
We find that in Spain there were minute regulations drawn up as
to the manner in which a deceased warrior might be represented
on his tomb. The details of sheathed or unsheathed sword, helm,
1 Arch. Journ., Ixiv. 15-23.