Armour & Weapons
Forfatter: Charles Ffoulkes
År: 1909
Forlag: At The Clarendon Press
Sted: Oxford
Sider: 112
UDK: 623 Ffou
With A Preface By Viscount Dillon, V.P.S.A. Curator Of The Tower Armouries
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
52
THE WEARING OF ARMOUR
CHAP. HI
passe-guard is quite another portion of the armour. In the Tower
Inventory of 1697 appears the entry, ‘ One Armour cap-a-pe
Engraven with a Ragged Staffe, made for ye Earle of Leisester,
a Mainfere, Passguard and Maineguard and Gantlett.’ Now it is
hardly reasonable to suppose that this ridge on the pauldron
should be specially mentioned as the Passe-guard without any notice
of the pauldron itself. In the Additional Notes to the above
article Viscount Dillon gives, from a List of Payments made in
connexion with jousts held on October 20,1519, ‘9 yards of Cheshire
cotton at 7^. for lining the king’s pasguard.’ That the neck-
guard to which we refer should need lining on the inside, where
it did not even touch the helmet, we may dismiss at once ; and
that the lining should be on the outside is of course absurd. As
far as can be gathered from recent research the passe-guard is
a reinforcing piece for the right elbow, used for jousting. It was
lined to protect the ordinary arm defence underneath from being
scratched, and also to lessen the shock to the wearer if it were
struck. It is to be hoped, from this reiteration of Viscount
Dillon’s researches, that at any rate one of the many errors of
nomenclature in armour may be corrected.
With regard to the thickness of plate armour, we should remem-
ber that it was forged from the solid ingot, and was not rolled in
sheets as is the material of to-day from which so many forgeries
are manufactured. The armourer was therefore able to graduate
the thickness of his material, increasing it where it was most
needed, and lessening it in those parts which were less exposed.
With regard to the proving of armour an article in Archaeologia,
vol. li, also by Viscount Dillon, is of great interest as showing the
indifferent skill of the English ironsmiths of the sixteenth century.
In 1590 a discussion arose as to the quality of the English iron
found in Shropshire as compared to the ‘ Hungere ’ iron which
came from Innsbruck. After some delay Sir Henry Lee, Master
of the Tower Armouries, arranged a test, and two breastplates
were prepared, of equal make and weight. Two pistol charges
of equal power were fired at the test breastplates, with the result