On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
46
A further instance of this fault was to be seen in the eastern
extension of the Victoria Street Bridge, Melbourne, erected in
1884, and represented in Fig. 41. This, however, was remedied
at the writer’s recommendation.
23. Cross girders too numerous and individually too weak.—
This fault is very commonly to be found in the earlier railway
bridges of Victoria and New South Wales that have come under
the author’s notice. The heaviest local load to be provided for
is that of the driving wheel of a locomotive, and amounts to
slightly over 8 tons for one type of Victorian locomotive, and
between 7 or 8 tons in five other types. In New South Wales
the weights are practically the same, for, though the engines are
heavier, they are supported on a greater number of wheels. But
it must not be forgotten that this load is liable to be largely
increased, first by the-downward resolved part of the thrust or
pull of the connecting rod, and second by the effect of imperfect
balancing, so that 10 tons is the very least amount it would be
safe to allow as the actual wheel load. Now, this load may come
upon every individual cross girder in succession, and therefore
every cross girder should be strong enough to resist it. At the
same time there is no advantage in placing them nearer together
than the minimum distance between the locomotive driving wheels,
which is about 5 feet. Cross girders then, at not less than 5 foot
intervals, each strong enough to carry the heaviest loaded pair of
engine wheels, constitute reasonable practice, and many good
recent structures correspond closely to this arrangement. On
some of the earlier Victorian, bridges, however, the interval is
only 2 feet 6 inches, and in New South Wales, 3 feet. The
stresses in these girders are found by computation to be from 7
to 12 tons per square inch—very alarming figures. Looking at
many of these earlier bridges it is difficult to understand why
their bottoms have not dropped out long ago. It is, however,
to be remembered that some of the worst have never been fully
loaded, double line bridges as at Penrith in New South Wales,
and Kororoit Creek, Victoria, carrying, hitherto, only single
lines of way, while in most cases heavy timber longitudinals or
stout continuous decks interposed between the track and the
cross girders tend to spread the load and prevent any individual
girder receiving its full punishment. Reliance upon these, how-