On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
47
ever, is not advisable, as bad workmanship, decay and imperfect
jointing may nullify their distributing action. The best thing
to do with these weak girders is to introduce longitudinal
connections of great stiffness between them. An arrangement
in iron or steel similar to what is known as “herring boning”
between the joists of a floor was recommended several years ago
by the author for Penrith Bridge, N.S.W., see Fig. 42.
24. Improperly designed cross girders.—These occasionally
occur, especially in the earlier bridges, and seem to have arisen
from an ill-advised attempt to make the cross girders of similar
type to the main girders. Badly designed lattice cross girders
with vital junctions made by single rivets only, and heavy
compressions taken, on thin flat bai’s of considerable length were
unfortunately to be found in some early Victorian bridges.
Many have now been removed, and their places taken by sub-
stantial plate girders. As an example of most improper design,
Fig. 43 may be quoted, which, not many years ago, was removed,
after a quarter of a century of service, from an important bridge
on a busy suburban railway near Melbourne. It will be seen
that the tension on. bar AB is 10 tons per sq. inch, the shear on
the rivet A, 8 tons per sq. inch, and pressure on the bearing area
25 tons per sq. inch—figures alarmingly high. The marvel is
that such girders failed to cause appalling disaster.
It is fully illustrated here as a warning to bridge designers,
and also as an encouragment; for the fact of these frightfully
over-stressed constructions having carried a busy suburban traffic
for a number of years without giving way, is a conclusive proof
of the extraordinary endurance of the material, which was only-
iron, and an evidence of the wide margin of strength against
unforeseen contingencies possessed by structures designed in a
scientific way under usual limitations as to permissible stress.
25. Unscientific forms of footpath brackets.—Many railway
and road bridges are provided with overhung footways outside
the main, girders. The brackets supporting these should be
rationally designed cantilevers continuous with the cross girders,
and consisting of a proper top and bottom chord, and suitable
web, either of continuous plate, or triangulated series of bars.
Unfortunately, however, an. unhealthy desire for ornament, over-
looking the fact that the really beautiful must be based upon
4