On Some Common Errors in Iron Bridge Design
Forfatter: W. C. Kernot
År: 1898
Forlag: FORD & SON
Sted: Melbourne
Sider: 49
UDK: 624.6
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
48
and grow out of that which is scientific and useful, has led many
designers into extravagancies and absurdities. For example the
old Church Street Bridge, Richmond, near Melbourne, originally
had footpath brackets made of thin round rods bent into the
curves of a raw’s horn, an absurd and excessively weak form,
while the recently constructed Swing Bridge at Footscray has
the webs of its footpath cantilevers made of circular rings of L
iron, a costly and unscientific arrangement, the exact strength
of. which it is impossible to compute. It is suggested that such
brackets be carefully examined, tested, and if showing any signs
of weakness strengthened, and that in future structures, scientific
and rational forms be adopted instead of these unsatisfactory
pseudo-ornamental abortions.
26. Parapets too Iotv, too weak, or too open.—These are of not
uncommon occurrence, and as sources of danger to the public
are frequently of serious import. An examination of such
parapets on bridges in. or near Melbourne has revealed the fact,
that some are less than 3 feet in height, while others approach
5 feet. The former are certainly dangerously low, the latter
needlessly high. It is recommended that no bridge parapet
should be less than 3 feet 6 inches, which is the height of the
elbow of a man of medium size, while 4 feet may be taken, as a
maximum beyond which it is unnecessary to go. The same rule
.should, in the writer’s opinion, be applied to the balustrades of
staircases, landings, and balconies in buildings. These are
usually too low, and have repeatedly been the cause of serious
accidents.
No rule has been to the writer’s knowledge generally accepted
for the strength of parapets. He therefore proposes that to
provide for the pressure of a dense crowd, they be made strong
enough to endure a horizontal pressure of 100 lbs. per foot in
length, applied at the top with a safety factor of not less than.
3 for metal and 5 for timber.
This strength may be provided by the resistance to bending of
the uprights or standards of the parapets. But if this be found
to involve an. undesirable amount of material, lighter standards
may be employed, with sloping struts outside. These struts
should be straight, inclined at an angle of not less than. 20 deg.
to the vertical, and extend from the projecting end of the foot-
■
MH